Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vin06m$2q2s$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IEUgPSAzLzQgbWPCsiBvciBFID0gbWPCsj8gVGhlIGZvcmdvdHRl?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?n_Hassenohrl_1905_work=2E?=
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 14:15:01 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <vin06m$2q2s$1@dont-email.me>
References: <309fb33a3a66f01873fdc890e899a968@www.novabbs.com>
 <674BCF8E.822@ix.netcom.com> <674CCA90.3DD9@ix.netcom.com>
 <a89d71ab22cb1e3e279a59fe50ab5ebb@www.novabbs.com>
 <9f1cd556912a273a8946c77614611242@www.novabbs.com>
 <8a0014e4135992c8ec7bd3f2f1983164@www.novabbs.com>
 <d906fde3148d43d339b1663f1127216a@www.novabbs.com>
 <13877dcc9c6a6f2dd8056d8c05f0c661@www.novabbs.com>
 <a7d26012926823b22e139af8670cbbe7@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2024 14:13:58 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e0273aba19c6a2d2b373a29b9d1ce4b4";
	logging-data="92252"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+AHssqn5cwo46EHbYXIqCZ"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6E8du9F2cJDSbEo0f6/HJ89VWbI=
In-Reply-To: <a7d26012926823b22e139af8670cbbe7@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 1987

> On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 18:22:50 +0000, rhertz wrote:
> 

>> BREAKING NEWS: E = mc² HAS BEEN PROVEN FALSE. TOTAL COLLAPSE OF THE
>> SCIENTIFIC ESTABLISMENT!
>>
>>
>> What would follow to this news, even if actually E = 0.99 mc²?

If you believe that E = const mc²
where const is any number, and the constant c is the speed
of light in the inertial frame where m is stationary,
then you believe that the speed of light is invariant.

Is this what you believe?


-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/