X-Received: by 2002:adf:e28c:: with SMTP id v12mr748979wri.157.1588914354278; Thu, 07 May 2020 22:05:54 -0700 (PDT) Path: ...!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Snit Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop Subject: Re: Please note. Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 22:05:53 -0700 Lines: 112 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: individual.net P3QujyHkDb6On1S3Ju3AUAnu1dD1KlmTQH6yrHedd0nc95933I Cancel-Lock: sha1:gShl/2fVAEVSOuI+bztI9zcX9FE= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 5092 On 5/7/20 9:36 PM, Diesel wrote: .... > Now you go and find some old source code you don't understand and ask > for Snits advice concerning it? The idiot didn't even realize what > you were asking about and provided you no answer. Ah, more trolling of me by you. So more reminding you of your past nonsense. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Diesel : ----- Snit, if you're running the bot you have an easy way out that won't cost you any respect, face, or anything else. Just stop. That's it. Simple right? ----- The last time the bot had posted was more than three hours before. Diesel made it clear he could find the IP of the person running the bot. And he made it clear it would be easy for him to make a Sandman-like time table of posting, but showing Carroll and the bot and myself. Was he lying when he said that? Maybe. But I do not think so. And if he was merely lying he would not have access to the program itself, which he makes VERY clear he did. Diesel and Carroll were trolling together. The bot goes silent. Diesel then says if the bot is just turned off he will let it slide. Does that sound like Diesel to you? And he also say this: ----- It needs to be recoded anyway, it's a seriously piss poor example of writing software. ----- Diesel made it clear he had access not just to the output of the bot but to the code itself. When called out on this he clarified it was merely the compiled code he had: ----- Do you think when you disassemble something that you're provided the original source code that was compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're given looks nothing like the original source code, but it still tells you *everything* about the program. ----- So how did Diesel get a copy of the program, compiled or not? My guess: he will NEVER say. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > David, have you been drinking so much that you already forgot how > easily Snit got confused with the AZ code explanation? He couldn't > make heads or tails of the description or the original source code. I was very clear I did not get it and never claimed to be a coder. But more trolling by you, more reminding you of your past silliness that got you so angry you ran away crying: --------------------------------------------------------------- Diesel : ----- Set A1 and A2 variables at the ascii value for A (On the IBM platform that value is 65) ----- Diesel : ----- > ----- > ASCII "A" is ALWAYS 65(Dec). There is no need to specify > WHICH system. > ----- > > Do you understand this yet? Yes, I do. ----- Seemed you got it. But then: Diesel: ----- I didn't run from any question of yours Snit, but you're a bit out there in left field when you try to infer that I don't know what ASCII is. As I've tried to tell you, previously, A is NOT ALWAYS 65. You cannot assume that to be set in stone. ----- Diesel: ----- > 2) I pointed out that ASCII "A" *always* is 65 in decimal. No, it's not. ----- He is still unable to find any counter-example though. --------------------------------------------------------------- .... -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.