Path: ...!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.uzoreto.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!one-in-the-eye-for-dustin.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Anonymous Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.computer.workshop Subject: Re: Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was - Oops! (Was - Re: '3D')) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:44:20 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 39 Message-ID: References: <2LydnQtYzodkUkXDnZ2dnUU7-WXNnZ2d@giganews.com> <4bMCG.37241$b86.32866@fx11.ams1> <060620201405165574%nospam@nospam.invalid> <5ARDG.15$WO.0@fx38.ams1> <1I_DG.3338$mZ6.3197@fx17.ams1> <6D6EG.902$ay7.435@fx22.ams1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 08:44:21 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: one-in-the-eye-for-dustin.eternal-september.org; posting-host="797fec6b3afcbe6562da26fe90be7745"; logging-data="4013"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ny+CcEU43rOM0UGFvdxrV" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:lQ3b3eT2POhsvsqXDCW3LVaGEys= In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Content-Language: en-US X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 200610-10, 06/10/2020), Outbound message Bytes: 3679 On 11/06/2020 08:57, Apd wrote: > "David_B" wrote: >> On 10/06/2020 20:35, Paul wrote: >>> David_B wrote: >>>> On my old iMac, I downloaded and installed the 'Trial' version of >>>> ClamXav. I then uninstalled it with the official uninstaller. I then >>>> used the AppCleaner software - and it found all manner of 'stuff' >>>> which ClamXav had left still installed. >>>> >>>> My concern is that what is 'left behind' MAY be doing malicious things >>>> - with the user of that computer being completely unaware of anything >>>> untoward happening. The product developer refused to discuss this >>>> possibility with me. :-( >>> >>> It is common industry practice ("code of the hills") to not >>> discuss the details of AV implementations. You could, for example, >>> be a Black Hat who is looking for a MacOSX vulnerability idea, and >>> whatever the developer had jammed into the OS, might be suggestive >>> of an API a Black Hat could attack. >> >> Ah! Thank you, Paul. :-) That's not something I have ever considered, >> nor has anyone else ever mentioned such a thing! > > Because I don't think it applies in this situation. The software was > supposed to be uninstalled. The leftovers you had were a marker (so it > would know about a reinstall) and possibly log files and other > ephemeral stuff. Did you carry out exactly the same procedure? It would be interesting to review the "marker" and "ephemeral stuff". Or are you simply guessing? -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus