Path: ...!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Snit Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop Subject: Re: Microsoft end of support dates Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:32:43 -0700 Lines: 182 Message-ID: References: <0sidhf9ts2l23bufftbbfsprcm6hivm4ir@4ax.com> <6dERG.111473$Sp6.4125@fx29.ams1> <8g5ehf14pcqbddvmc66ahjvk3js1okf7ko@4ax.com> <7naehftdkmam8vcocisms2f1397cu01fe1@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net rTC8Ylp6Gzir2BJcsQ2zHwlcthhtJeh3FvLk5tUTWclbbdv1TH Cancel-Lock: sha1:EeRz3HDuN5gMluBIv5EW8DC6X/Y= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 9805 On 7/29/20 2:04 PM, Gremlin wrote: > Snit > news:ho1a9nFkkvuU1@mid.individual.net Fri, 24 Jul 2020 23:48:06 GMT > in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > >> On 7/24/20 2:07 PM, David_B wrote: >>> On 24/07/2020 21:02, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> On 2020-07-24, David_B wrote: >>>>> On 24/07/2020 13:59, Diesel wrote: >>>>>> David_B >>>>>> news:IkySG.187086$Fm.135614@fx28.ams1 Fri, 24 Jul 2020 >>>>>> 10:02:16 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 24/07/2020 08:13, Diesel wrote: >>>>>>>> David_B >>>>>>> [....] >>>>>>>>> I'm 100% confident that Snit is not/was not >>>>>>>>> responsible for the 'flood' posts. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm inclined to agree with you there, David. I still don't >>>>>>>> think either of them are actually behind it. I think it's >>>>>>>> most likely one (but could be more) individual who knows >>>>>>>> them both (likely a regular of cola or something they both >>>>>>>> know each other from) and is taking advantage of their >>>>>>>> animosity towards each other for free entertainment. Not >>>>>>>> only is the bot code itself lame as fuck all, the individual >>>>>>>> who's so proud of it obviously is such a loser, his/her only >>>>>>>> chance of entertainment is usenet trolling. And, it's not >>>>>>>> even that good, being as it's so easy to filter out. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Apd and myself disagree somewhat on the automation aspects >>>>>>>> of the bot. I'm not convinced it's automated in any real way >>>>>>>> based on some tests i've been doing. You didn't really think >>>>>>>> my replies to yourself and Snit was only intended for you >>>>>>>> did ya? and, I'm not spamming anywhere; thanks. Please learn >>>>>>>> to use the proper terminology if you're going to accuse me >>>>>>>> of something. I've been xposting for several reasons. One is >>>>>>>> part of an ongoing analysis test and the other is to ensure >>>>>>>> the groups I'm familiar with all get to know your new best >>>>>>>> friend, before he's able to cause much of a ruckus there. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have far more confidence in what Apd has to say on the >>>>>>> matter. >>>>>>> :-D >>>>>> >>>>>> Apd agrees with me concerning what Snit wrote about me. What >>>>>> is your confidence in that? Or, is your confidence dependent >>>>>> on whether or not he agrees with me, specifically? Do be >>>>>> honest, David. You never know who might be reading this. >>>>> >>>>> The truth is that, as far as I'm aware, Apd has always been >>>>> truthful. >>>>> >>>>> I've had no cause to doubt what he says, but confess that I >>>>> would like to have a better understanding of the 'real-life >>>>> him. >>>> >>>> Being that you've neglected your lesson on function basics, and >>>> being that Snit now seems to have 'manipulated' you into being >>>> ashamed to even try to learn anything (that's some 'friend' you >>>> have there), I offer: >>>> >>>> let mystery = >>>> [72,111,119,32,99,97,110,32,65,112,100,32,107,110,111,119,32,116, >>>> 104,101,,32,116,114,117,116,104,32,104,101,114,101,63] >>>> >>>> >>>> function mysterySolver(array) { return mystery.map(num => >>>> String.fromCharCode(num)).join('') } >>>> >>>> What's going on there? >>> >>> I'll pass - and ask FromTheRafters. >>> >> >> I ran it and got "undefined". >> >> But what it is doing is getting the ASCII character of each code. >> Given how ASCII is a standard, notice how Carroll did not have to >> specify what OS or machine... ASCII will be the same on macOS, >> Linux, Windows, etc. > > ASCII is one standard, and this is all besides the point. It was pretty key to the point I was making, and perhaps the one Carroll was. But, of course, being that you almost surely ARE Carroll you can speak for him. And, again being Carroll, you will try to speak FOR me, and your posts will show your obsession with me. And you will "magically" have knowledge of Carroll's accusations from the past, but then whenever I quote Carroll you will pretend to not know a thing about it and demand Message IDs and then twist just as Carroll does. All predictable. And all explained best by you being yet another Carroll sock. You really do not understand how poorly you hide your tells, Carroll -- but folks like Diesel will PRETEND to not see to further their trolling, and you will use their insecurities to manipulate them. Again, all very predictable. See below for a string of your tells... you really just can't deal with the fact I have you set on auto-read. You NEED my attention. How pathetic. > The only > reason you jumped on me for specifying the codepage in the AZ thread > was to cover up your severe reading comprehension on display when you > told us how 'confusing' the instructions were, as you proceeded to > 'improve' them with your take on what you thought you understood. > > It was quite obvious based on replies from myself and others that you > were beyond, simply lost. But, after reading many threads about you, > and interacting with you a bit myself, I realize that when you're in > way over your little head, you'll try to attack with anything you > think you can to distract others from your own failures. > > And that's what and all you've done since you got here. And your lies > on me didn't fool anyone important. Ftr and Apd have both commented > concerning your activities, and both of them commented when Carroll > brought up the things you like doing. > > You aren't fooling anyone: > > On 6/11/20 5:19 PM, Apd wrote: >> "Steve Carroll - fretwizzer" wrote: >>> On Thursday, June 11, 2020 at 2:06:57 PM UTC-6, Apd wrote: >>>> "Steve Carroll - fretwizzer" wrote: >>>>> When did I 'snip and run' with you? >>>> >>>> Last week. >>>> MID: <3b29cd12-1944-4e84...@googlegroups.com> >>>> You quoted one line: >>>> "Whatever the difference you still do the same things". >>>> >>>> What I meant by "do" is "accuse each other of" >>> >>> And I explained that I don't merely accuse. In large part, >>> I do what you just said to Snit in a previous post, I'll >>> confront his BS (unsupported) allegations. If you've been >>> reading, you can see he's doing the same thing with Diesel >>> right now. >> >> Yup. > > >> I decided to play... sigh... figuring I would regret it. Actually >> it was not as bad as I thought. I grabbed the number list and >> wrote this: > > You're trying to impress us with script kiddie level of > understanding, so you can continue to participate in the discussion > that's above your paygrade. You aren't fooling anyone, Snit. > > And your efforts to brown nose the others isn't working either. They > *both know* you've been lying and essentially, trolling the entire > time you've been here. > > And, none of us took Carrolls word concerning you for anything, we > let you show us what you're about, yourself. And you have. You have > failed to snow others here, Snit. > ========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========