X-Received: by 2002:adf:97de:: with SMTP id t30mr19509149wrb.135.1587850277956; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 14:31:17 -0700 (PDT) Path: ...!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Mike Easter Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop Subject: Re: Microsoft Most Valuable Professionals Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 14:31:15 -0700 Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: individual.net NCoPEq6czgIXGb6LEMr5ZQLZTEN1lhlvUytOfApPafrmIDlvu0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:NvAH27TOHPQrI6c1ISlsjihRJnc= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2289 Shadow wrote: > See the CURRENT legal definition of cyberstalking. > "Pin pushing"? LOL!!!! I have read a number of articles comparing 'googling' (or otherwise searching on someone) vs stalking or cyberstalking behavior. Those articles don't agree with you. 99.9% of the time BD's misbehavior in this regard falls into the category of 'exposing' his trivial googling behaviors, which is considered 'gauche' by most of the people writing on the topic of people searching on each other, which searching/googling is VERY common practice. Occasionally his misbehavior in this regard 'crosses the line' in terms of being abusive toward his unwilling target. That is not 'nice' ie positively rude and mean-spirited. Unchristian, or some similar adjective. My pin-pusher remark related to an early msg of mine comparing him to an entomologist hunting and capturing an insect which then he puts on a pin in his display case to 'show' it to the community or class. So, part of my criticism of some of your own past behaviors are about taunting, harassing, or name-calling of someone/BD 'incessantly'. That is not nice either. -- Mike Easter