Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.uzoreto.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Snit Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop Subject: Re: Ha! Ads be gone! Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology Lines: 208 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net dxgLVSE7UoNFCAfGd3Bf/QVaqfaTFflxINvXjfH94ZQdFCeU7V Cancel-Lock: sha1:tqi9dZV202uvCDo3jYmTbsJxNkI= User-Agent: Usenapp/0.80.4/l beta for MacOS Bytes: 9104 On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote: > Snit > news:hpjh75Fkie0U19@mid.individual.net Thu, 13 Aug 2020 00:52:54 GMT > in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > >> On Aug 12, 2020 at 4:24:15 PM MST, "Gremlin" >> wrote: >> >>> Snit >>> news:hpimmoFkie0U7@mid.individual.net Wed, 12 Aug 2020 17:20:24 >>> GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >>> Snit, as can clearly be shown by the rest of my reply that you >>> opted to snit out, what you're writing simply isn't the case. >> >> OK, trying AGAIN to make peace with you. > > I don't follow you here, There are many comments you do not "follow"... then you accuse others of the reading comprehension issues you repeatedly show. > and I'll gladly explain why - whether you > actually want me to or not. Snipped your lie about my actions with the floodbot. The horse is dead. If you want to discuss it let's do it over Zoom. If not then let it drop. You simply failed to understand what you read. You do that a lot. Not gonna keep entertaining your nonsense on it. Snipped where you cried it took you a long time to find posts by their Message ID, and where you STILL show no understanding. Again we can talk about that on Zoom or not at all. The horse is dead. > >> 2) Phone records: I do not care what tools or systems you use. >> They are not relevant to the absolute fact that the number you >> verbally told me also showed in my phone records. > > They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone number I > provided you verbally into a bogus call log video you've taken the > time to create. This is a direct lie on your part. These videos are not in any way faked EVEN IF you cannot figure out how your number showed up or cannot even accept that it did. https://ibb.co/fpJry4K https://youtu.be/xRvaRLlb3b8 https://youtu.be/xNvMu5fwUxQ It is simply a fact that your number shows up there. And remember, I have given you suggestions on how you can troubleshoot this and learn about some about the tech you claim to understand. You have yet to be able to troubleshoot it. So be it. You are not obligated to learn about your phone system, or what information is available to others, but please stop lying about what is in MY call records. You are simply wrong... and given how you have been told you are wrong you are not unintentional with your false claims -- you are lying. > When I use the cell I provided you the number for to > make outbound calls, It *ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. That is incorrect, as you have been told and shown. Your claim is contrary to reality. So now that you know your claim is incorrect, will you keep repeating it? I bet you do. You are happy to lie. Below you go FAR off topic trying to pretend what I have shown you to be true is somehow not true when it is true. In short: you fail to understand very basic concepts. You do that a lot. I did a search for the number. Google only finds it tied to ANOTHER business, not yours. And the name of the business when you call that number -- not licensed in Tennessee. https://tnbear.tn.gov/Ecommerce/FilingSearch.aspx And the name is available if I do a search here: https://tnbear.tn.gov/Ecommerce/NameAvailability.aspx And you have no website... a tech business with no website is, well, certainly not the norm! And there are no reviews (no, I would not do as those who troll me do and post fake ones against you). All seems very odd. Your business seems as real as my "Southern Nevada Institute of Technology" (SNIT). Hmmmm.... .... >> 3) Sharing info from the phone record publicly. You DID give me >> direct permission to share the information in my call log -- and >> that DOES include your number. Period. > > At no time, did I *ever* give you permission to share the phone > number, and i'm tired of your little game concerning that. I've made > my position on that quite clear. Period. Gremlin : ----- You have my permission to post your caller ID logs, snit. ----- You can deny that post exists, but remember it is easy for those of us who can find posts by message ID to find that exact post where you gave permission. >> me permission I have STILL opted to not share because, frankly, it >> is clear you have no real idea what you are talking about on this. > > Actually, it's clear you have no idea who you're threatening to play > doxing games with...So, I'm just going to provide you a single > example of what my response to your actions might be like, > initially, for you. > > > https://thepiratebay0.org/torrent/17867867/The_Band_Perry-Pioneer-(Retail)-2013-HHI I understand you are flipping out so badly you are making threats, just as you have threatened others. And I also understand I have saved this post, and if you carry out your threat I will forward it to the Kingsport, TN police. They can decide if they want to act on it or not. Maybe they will. Maybe they will not. .... > I told you, script kiddie, you be fucking with the wrong one. and > you have been, the entire time. I've got all kinds of 'tricks' up my > sleeve snit. when I say I can bring forth hell down upon you, it's > because, I really, can. Remember when you were denying being really, really angry over how I have called you out on your trolling. It comes across loud and clear in your text! You are beside yourself in anger there... lashing out in humiliation. All because I said I want to make peace with you. You are not a very mature person. > >> Again, there is NO question your number shows up in that log, and >> that is true EVEN IF you do not know how, even if I do not know >> how, and even if you do not believe it. Oh, and David never asked >> for your number in any way. > > The only possible way for any number to be in any log of yours, is > if you took the time and effort to insert it. See: you do not understand the tech you use so you make up stories. You do that a lot. > Otherwise, it's not > possible for it to be there. Period. Sorry, but, it just isn't. You failing to accept reality does not make reality change. It really is that simple. > David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared > with you. This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing. > You happily did so. You've gone onto attempt to do some > limited research concerning my business. Has nothing to do with David. I did some research based on your claim. No business license with the name you claim for your business. No website with that name in your location. No evidence any such business has ever existed. David is irrelevant here -- the fact you claim to have a business you do not is relevant. You have been caught lying again. > I can only assume that > you're stalking me. You are the one who called me and claimed to be doing so from your business. When a business calls you they should not cry if someone looks up their business name! > Unless you can provide a legitimate reason for > showing any interest in my business, there, Snit? You called me from what you claim to be your business line! ========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========