Path: ...!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: VanguardLH Newsgroups: alt.comp.software.firefox,news.software.readers Subject: Re: Keywords header Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 15:01:56 -0500 Organization: Usenet Elder Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <5xpuhyxthcy3.dlg@v.nguard.lh> Reply-To: invalid@invalid.invalid Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net XyAosTmArsnltzEeDJeIjgZGkDnJsdfcSii3SvyitF5llweWWb Keywords: VanguardLH VLH811 Cancel-Lock: sha1:arIN9DXinrAq0wrTpVxNjNQOQvQ= User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.41 Bytes: 2056 "Adam H. Kerman" wrote: > VanguardLH wrote: > >>Oh, I also have a filter on foul-mouthed posters. Several test on >>headers (Subject, From, Organization, Keywords, or X-headers) with a >>value containing foul words, like "fuck". Yep, you have one: > >>X-US-Congress: Moronic Fucks. . . . > > Who the fuck cares what you filter with your fucking kill file? It's > none of fucking Usenet's fucking business. > > Fuck. Fucking public plonking announcements are fucking immature. And you don't care that *I* filtered out Panix articles when Panix used to spammify posts submitted to them, too. You don't care about any of my filters. You only care about YOUR filters. DUH! I explained to Eli why I didn't see his article thinking it originally was due to him using Panix, but after modifying that filter (to no longer ignore-flag those articles) then noticed he also has foul language in his headers. You really want to lower your reputation in Usenet to that of a foul-mouthed inane peurile? How old are you (mentally, not physically)?