X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6489:: with SMTP id o9mr974313wri.397.1626122441780;
        Mon, 12 Jul 2021 13:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: ...!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix5.panix.com!qz!not-for-mail
From: Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com>
Newsgroups: comp.misc
Subject: Go statement considered harmful
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 20:40:41 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Some absurd concept
Message-ID: <eli$2107121640@qaz.wtf>
Injection-Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 20:40:41 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix5.panix.com:166.84.1.5";
	logging-data="27921"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
User-Agent: Vectrex rn 2.1 (beta)
X-Liz: It's actually happened, the entire Internet is a massive game of Redcode
X-Motto: "Erosion of rights never seems to reverse itself." -- kenny@panix
X-US-Congress: Moronic Fucks.
X-Attribution: EtB
XFrom: is a real address
Encrypted: double rot-13
Bytes: 1885
Lines: 17

This is an older (2018) blog post about a concurrency method the author
has implemented as a Python library. There's nothing inherently Python
about the method, and the title makes reference to the command used in
Go (golang) for creating new threads while also referencing the famous
Dijkstra piece. Along the way it has a detour through FLOW-MATIC[*] for
anyone who really doesn't understand _what_ Dijkstra was complaining
about in "Goto Considered Harmful".

Notes on structured concurrency, or: Go statement considered harmful

https://vorpus.org/blog/notes-on-structured-concurrency-or-go-statement-considered-harmful/

It's a pretty good read and persuasive about issues with current
concurrency.

Elijah
------
[*] with the same code example as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FLOW-MATIC