Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!4.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!D2+/BXlgbClNG4nyP3lmzw.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Hibou Newsgroups: fr.lettres.langue.anglaise Subject: Re: nonplussed Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 06:21:30 +0100 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <61619744$0$8914$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <61619fb5$0$5971$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <61620260$0$4989$426a74cc@news.free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="11015"; posting-host="D2+/BXlgbClNG4nyP3lmzw.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org"; User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 Content-Language: fr-FR X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2 Bytes: 1872 Lines: 16 Le 09/10/2021 à 21:58, Promer Denoir a écrit : > > Cependant un de mes dicos : > > -------------- > In standard use *nonplussed* means ?surprised and confused?, as > in /she was/ *nonplussed* /at his eagerness to help out/. In > North American English a new use has developed in recent years, > meaning ?unperturbed?-more or less the opposite of its > traditional meaning-as in /he was clearly trying to > appear/ *nonplussed*. This new use probably arose on the > assumption that non- was the normal negative prefix and must > therefore have a negative meaning. Although the use is common it > is not yet considered standard. > -------------- Rires de Diabolo ! (Oui, il est toujours là, Diabolo.)