Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!iVhn6ACk96JLuhtcaD78ew.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joye <joye@nospamhotmail.com>
Newsgroups: fr.lettres.langue.anglaise
Subject: Re: shambles
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 08:29:28 -0500
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <skjsrp$88n$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <616d3428$0$20283$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="8471"; posting-host="iVhn6ACk96JLuhtcaD78ew.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.2.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 1226
Lines: 9

On 10/18/2021 3:45 AM, campa wrote:

> Je pensais que on disait "in a shambles" comme dans les
>   dictionnaires, mais à priori c'est "in shambles" de nos
>   jours.

Les deux se disent. Voir ici :

https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/shambles