Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.trigofacile.com!usenet-fr.net!agneau.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!cleanfeed1-a.proxad.net!nnrp4-2.free.fr!not-for-mail Subject: Re: que penser de l'argument du consensus... Newsgroups: fr.soc.environnement References: <61af57db$0$1347$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <61af5b18$0$3712$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <61af89cb$0$1348$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <61afcde6$0$20280$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <61afede8$0$20251$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <61b01f29$0$4984$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <61b061c7$0$1361$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <61b0ab35$0$3715$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <61b0afed$0$3749$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <61b0b78a$0$3687$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <61b0baff$0$3715$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <61b0be6c$0$20273$426a74cc@news.free.fr> From: Topinambour Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 15:21:40 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <61b0be6c$0$20273$426a74cc@news.free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 6 Message-ID: <61b0bf74$0$6479$426a74cc@news.free.fr> Organization: Guest of ProXad - France NNTP-Posting-Date: 08 Dec 2021 15:21:40 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.165.216.228 X-Trace: 1638973300 news-1.free.fr 6479 91.165.216.228:25834 X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net Bytes: 1791 Le 08/12/2021 à 15:17, Paul Aubrin a écrit : > Ce n'est pas un point de vue. C'est le fondement de la méthode > scientifique Point de vue, prétentieux.