Path: ...!news.nobody.at!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!zrD2tr+/eVT9kFYXPhpyaQ.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Vincent Thiernesse" Newsgroups: fr.sci.electronique Subject: Re: Detecteur presence Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 22:34:17 +0200 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <-fJspq4J8pf6YxyeXvaFHuDWvuU@jntp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="59679"; posting-host="zrD2tr+/eVT9kFYXPhpyaQ.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org"; X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3528.331 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3528.331 X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 220629-4, 6/29/2022), Outbound message Importance: Normal Bytes: 1360 X-Original-Lines: 1 >Avez-vous des infos là dessus, est-ce le même principe que les radars ? >Est-ce plus fiable qu'un PIR ? Les détecteurs RF, c'est PIR ! Vin -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus