X-Received: by 2002:ae9:e702:0:b0:6b5:9c37:8b23 with SMTP id m2-20020ae9e702000000b006b59c378b23mr19767250qka.511.1661341004206; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 04:36:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:f111:b0:11c:e124:cd88 with SMTP id k17-20020a056870f11100b0011ce124cd88mr3303589oac.39.1661341003945; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 04:36:43 -0700 (PDT) Path: ...!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: fr.sci.astrophysique Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 04:36:43 -0700 (PDT) Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=93.27.150.145; posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ NNTP-Posting-Host: 93.27.150.145 User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <659a23cb-83d6-4022-ac5c-13d12cb184c5n@googlegroups.com> Subject: LIGO's Gravitational Waves Disproved in...1887 From: Pentcho Valev Injection-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 11:36:44 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bytes: 3857 Lines: 47 Spacetime and gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime) don't exist - LIGO= 's "discoveries" are fakes. The reason is that the speed of light is VARIAB= LE AS PER NEWTON, as originally (prior to introducing the length-contractio= n fudge factor) proved by the Michelson-Morley experiment: https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-f10f1c25528a4e5edc9bae200640f31c-pjl= q "Emission theory, also called emitter theory or ballistic theory of light, = was a competing theory for the special theory of relativity, explaining the= results of the Michelson=E2=80=93Morley experiment of 1887. [...] The name= most often associated with emission theory is Isaac Newton. In his corpusc= ular theory Newton visualized light "corpuscles" being thrown off from hot = bodies at a nominal speed of c with respect to the emitting object, and obe= ying the usual laws of Newtonian mechanics, and we then expect light to be = moving towards us with a speed that is offset by the speed of the distant e= mitter (c =C2=B1 v)." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emission_theory So in 1887 the Michelson-Morley experiment was compatible with Newton's var= iable speed of light, c'=3Dc=C2=B1v. The crucial question is: Was the experiment simultaneously, in 1887, compatible with the constant sp= eed of light, c'=3Dc, posited by the ether theory and "borrowed" by Einstei= n in 1905? The answer "yes" is too blatantly fraudulent, even by the standards of the = Einstein cult, so Einsteinians don't discuss this question. Only Banesh Hof= fmann did, but his implicit answer was "no": "Moreover, if light consists of particles, as Einstein had suggested in his= paper submitted just thirteen weeks before this one, the second principle = seems absurd: A stone thrown from a speeding train can do far more damage t= han one thrown from a train at rest; the speed of the particle is not indep= endent of the motion of the object emitting it. And if we take light to con= sist of particles and assume that these particles obey Newton's laws, they = will conform to Newtonian relativity and thus automatically account for the= null result of the Michelson-Morley experiment without recourse to contrac= ting lengths, local time, or Lorentz transformations. Yet, as we have seen,= Einstein resisted the temptation to account for the null result in terms o= f particles of light and simple, familiar Newtonian ideas, and introduced a= s his second postulate something that was more or less obvious when thought= of in terms of waves in an ether." Banesh Hoffmann, Relativity and Its Roo= ts, p.92 https://www.amazon.com/Relativity-Its-Roots-Banesh-Hoffmann/dp/048= 6406768 See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev Pentcho Valev