X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1343:b0:403:ba0f:5779 with SMTP id w3-20020a05622a134300b00403ba0f5779mr16558qtk.11.1690041271977;
        Sat, 22 Jul 2023 08:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:a8aa:b0:1b0:3945:af0b with SMTP id
 eb42-20020a056870a8aa00b001b03945af0bmr5775358oab.9.1690041271582; Sat, 22
 Jul 2023 08:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
Path: ...!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: fr.sci.physique
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2023 08:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <YD6XpYxmn8-XlN8nn1C9mmIfRVA@jntp>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2001:861:8bb7:5500:ed10:6cf1:dfd2:9aaf;
 posting-account=PKzfqAoAAAC4-vQRW_wt6WFB3xnoeWfi
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:861:8bb7:5500:ed10:6cf1:dfd2:9aaf
References: <XsQK06WmG5UE8EA9eBhXPf3xb2A@jntp> <533598ba-ede7-47c6-ab86-df643e523597n@googlegroups.com>
 <u8mjmi$3asfi$1@dont-email.me> <DLards55SEpwIvGCvWdk-tcGzCg@jntp>
 <ea9e9bc3-89d2-4c48-bbaa-b8d0ae148906n@googlegroups.com> <nqXw0YFdoyCBJgTdNWuGHYL8ExU@jntp>
 <u8oeaa$3jv9a$1@dont-email.me> <ab411f6b-cd5b-4223-9726-ee632635b6efn@googlegroups.com>
 <YD6XpYxmn8-XlN8nn1C9mmIfRVA@jntp>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <59c38ec9-ee3c-43f2-a5ec-45c119426989n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_De_la_relativit=C3=A9_des_distances?=
From: Richard Verret <rverret97@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2023 15:54:31 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bytes: 2084
Lines: 7

Le 21/07/2023 =C3=A0 20:57, Richard Hachel a =C3=A9crit :
> Le 21/07/2023 =C3=A0 17:56, Richard Verret a =C3=A9crit :
>> Ce que tu appelles vitesse apparente est la vitesse radiale, le temps n=
=E2=80=99est pas affect=C3=A9 parce qu=E2=80=99=C3=A9metteur et r=C3=A9cept=
eur se rapprochent ou s=E2=80=99=C3=A9loignent.
>  La chronotropie, non. Elle n'est due qu'=C3=A0 la vitesse pure.=20
>  Mais le temps, oui. A cause de l'anisotropie.=20
Pourrais-tu expliciter ces affirmations,stp.?