Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!.POSTED.82-64-219-111.subs.proxad.net!not-for-mail From: Fleuger Newsgroups: fr.comp.os.mac-os.x Subject: Re: Document secret Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 09:30:35 -0000 (UTC) Organization: fuzi Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Gerflot MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 09:30:35 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: rasp.pasdenom.info; posting-account="g5fleurot@usenet"; posting-host="82-64-219-111.subs.proxad.net:82.64.219.111"; logging-data="2677"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@pasdenom.info" Cancel-Lock: sha1:+UzhfR/nFDUf176YtBbhvNeoJqw= sha256:ey6+yJ8sh7lFoOz+nN+uvnafVxqCWaWifGp0hAXwevA= sha1:PxAGocZrlvowETKlQDeU3JP5Rx8= sha256:9m38IYburAlZyXCTUomVL2WuUblaM0JwX6dL6pzbr3w= sha1:7aTawyzKIUXtHBO85Rr152VZAJY= sha256:gc8weRZH181LN4cik5zAwU+gUWFlrm3d2KUzsuDWmRU= Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwCAYAAABXAvmHAAABe0lEQVR4nOyVyRHDIAxFKSm luKSUklJcVm7OMiHeJPEFwsJjDrowBr+nBcI0TeHM4Q7QBbwBuoA3QBfwBugC3gBdwPKwcQxTDG S9KYEI+HyuYbn1JgU+kDGWWd+uNydAgUZYas1Sokr2EQGruTDJPCrAtVSJhEnbIC2UEj1UQMrkS uxxm4OBP1xAyuRKZgn/ixoDbVaBHRwhYD3AJjNA9fk/CIEmKsCJ7ACBGXC7hZB22lbnkCEOd91h KbDaLzMpoJGQ3gCXl1grQM1BjUeL42I/1EpIQqUCEpP4ca5EGN57h3lvbrsgLMlNWpEtfEm2TQV QiRwB6Z+pf8sHDjoJDTwCXS4QJQbwsISACEkkC0oa9COwElnwRII0bYuVGKgCl30WOAEOzxycsY QEJZALrrr1VIPGCMDwBcOaJZAaPE7A6oYxERChNm2hhS8BVwtAfW0wlNUFVhIAfA1oGwEm+7WBT QS+G4n+94hTw19XoKVwB7i8wAsAAP//AwAvt+R/mbrp3wAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== In-Reply-To: X-Keyword: reply/noreply X-Face: 6e|FS-+[tsA{3yQ^i0Js:O.\FWpq/o8_:3=f90joA^LE~Q Bytes: 3054 Lines: 11 Le 13 février 2024 à 09:46, M.V. a écrit ceci : > Ça ne permet pas de redonner à la version macOS de openssl la priorité, > si ? Ça permet de comprendre que brew Mojave est un vrai pataquès. Avec Sonoma, dans /opt qui était sa place logique, ç'est mieux, mais il semble qu'il y ait toujours un problème avec openssl@1.1 -- Gérard FLEUROT