Path: not-for-mail From: Stan Brown Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: No fault cell phone law Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:32:56 -0700 Organization: Oak Road Systems Lines: 25 Message-Id: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net +YzOkPQEFWYt80jw3ALlyQninOU0J2ShImJzuMWWYSrPZsnPyH Cancel-Lock: sha1:24wMXEiESCaHpC5C3HgfXI/UmBc= sha256:TTU4UYlPqKEFOfdsXHHzg8QH/x6PP0WZgwPVJvBhH7s= User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.11 (GRC) On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 10:26:07 -0700, AJL wrote: > On 3/17/2024 9:03 AM, Stan Brown wrote: > > All comments below apply to my state AZ/US only. YMMV. > > > There is no such thing as "an automobile driver with the right of > > way." It's basic driver's ed. You NEVER "have" the right of way. > > A driver can have the right of way. I wonder about your source for Arizona law. When I checked for California, there were lots of pages claiming circumstances where the driver has the right of way, but they are all just trying to keep things simple and readable. The actual code doesn't give anyone the right of way at an intersection: As I said, it details circumstances under which you must yield to another vehicle. -- Stan Brown, Tehachapi, California, USA https://BrownMath.com/ Shikata ga nai...