Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math Subject: Re: Getting there at last... Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 11:31:26 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 296 Message-ID: References: <1HWE6H1jV8YTvxfaaL7fnCCcpe8@jntp> <1bcd63e24f9d1f35a1aa7af1b44091d2@www.novabbs.org> <9YCpfbWayDDTVrmI9Yye1LKiThs@jntp> <660C3EF7.3876@ix.netcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 18:31:28 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4d8b8da5d55f5a03e28393cacdc89191"; logging-data="3543844"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX184gvc0WMvbsKOH9yfDcCfO/mtP+h5Zb4U=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:v06rGnJZDpAZ6Zze8yxbTo/6ZvU= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <660C3EF7.3876@ix.netcom.com> Bytes: 13117 On 4/2/2024 10:23 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> >> Le 02/04/2024 à 16:51, Thomas Heger a écrit : >>> Am 30.03.2024 um 11:38 schrieb Arindam Banerjee: >>>> Le 30/03/2024 à 18:48, Thomas Heger a écrit : >>>>> Am 28.03.2024 um 08:09 schrieb Arindam Banerjee: >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maybe you like my 'book' >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> TH >>>>>> >>>>>> From your book, the following quote >>>>>> *** >>>>>> This project was started as a search for the connection between QM and >>>>>> GR. The connection was hypothesized and assumed to exist (without >>>>>> knowing it's specific features), since nature has to be understood as an >>>>>> undivided system. So all theories should describe the same world, but >>>>>> possibly different aspects. Spacetime is a physical system, hence should >>>>>> be build out of 'elements' (what are the 'building blocks'). *** >>>>>> >>>>>> Any connection between two theoretical (conjectural, impractical as yet) >>>>>> notions as QM and GR must necessarily be theoretical as well. >>>>> >>>>> Sure. >>>>> >>>>> If you try to find a way between to spots (let's call them 'QM' and >>>>> 'GR'), you need to assume, those spots do in fact exist. >>>>> >>>>> It's not the duty of the pathfinder, to prove the existence of the two >>>>> endpoints of the way found. >>>>> >>>>> If there is actually nothing at these positions, it's actually not his >>>>> fault. >>>>> >>>>>> In theory, the Moon is green cheese with cows jumping over it. >>>>> >>>>> No, not really. At least I've never heard of such a theory. >>>>> >>>>>> People were burnt to death for not believing that the stars moved in >>>>>> crystal spheres, and the stars were holes in those spheres to let >>>>>> heavenly light in. >>>>> >>>>> Well, that's not quite true, neither. >>>>> >>>>> Unfortunately, the catholic church had killed several scientists in >>>>> the middle ages, but not because of their discoveries, but because >>>>> they were questioning the authority of the church. >>>>> >>>>> That authority was meant to be absolute and ANY disobedience could be >>>>> punished by death. >>>>> >>>>> This has changed significantly and today the pope does not intervene >>>>> in physics anymore. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The justification for QM and GR as practical let alone scientific is not >>>>>> there. >>>>> >>>>> Well, yes, because that was NOT my topic. >>>>> >>>>>> While there is charm in seeing the moon as green cheese with cows >>>>>> jumping around it, and there is profit in all the heaven stuff, I see >>>>>> neither pleasure nor profit from QM and GR, save for the careerists and >>>>>> their dupes blown by math mumbo-jumbo. I know this is the most powerful >>>>>> nonsense ever to be globally accepted, in our times, and that deserves >>>>>> respect. >>>>> >>>>> You may rightfully critizise QM and GR, and in a way I would >>>>> understand you, but this was not the subject of my 'book'. >>>>> >>>>>> Those really into physics better study my videos and texts relating to >>>>>> physics. The US Navy, I find, has appropriated my new design rail gun >>>>>> for their ships. The Chinese are using a version of that to launch their >>>>>> warplanes from navy carriers. Facebook is so useful, to present new >>>>>> discoveries and inventions, and see how they get stolen. >>>>> >>>>> You invented the railgun? ? ? ? >>>> >>>> Yes, I invented a new design railgun, where the bullet is heavy, >>>> perpendicular to the rails, and the voltage is low. Overall, this design >>>> is 10-100 more efficient than the earlier rail guns of the US as shown >>>> in their pre 2015 videos. So it is practical and has been known since my >>>> first paper on it in 2013. I showed that to my PhD supervisor in 2015, >>>> and I suspect that it was transmitted to the relevant people from that >>>> time. In 2017 I published the details of the invention in a series of >>>> youtube videos. >>>> My idea behind my PhD work (btw I am not a PhD as in the final viva they >>>> said I had not made a working model of a rail gun, which was not what my >>>> supervisor had been saying) was to show that the Lorentz force >>>> accelerating the bullet had no ELECTRICAL reaction. (Since I have used >>>> a rolling bullet/armature in my videos, there is apparently some >>>> reaction but that is mechanical, due to the treadmill effect.) My >>>> detailed analysis shows inertia violation. >>> >>> I had always thought, that my 'book' was 'revolutionary'. >>> >>> But your research is far more revolutionary than mine. >> >> The research period was from 1998 - 2015. It is development time now. >> Thanks very much. >>> >>> So, hope the best for you, but see trouble ahead, because you are >>> stepping on a lot of feet. >> >> Never a truer word was said. I am glad that at least one physicist in the >> universe is not mocking or ignoring me. That is a start. >>> >>> It's interesting, anyhow. >> >> Well, it will take a lot of money to make a working prototype of an >> internal force machine that will replace all rockets and jet engines. >> How I can earn that money, is my present concern. Let us see if my next >> project (making a very cheap "free energy" drive) works as my >> maths/intuition says is should. I have found no patents for that, and that >> is good. >>> >>> btw: I had 'published' my 'book' as google doc presentation, which >>> worked quite well. >> >> My book "To the Stars" was published in Jan 2000 in my new "adda" website. >> I presented my new formula e=0.5mVVN(N-k) to explain mass and energy >> relationships on a kinetic and non-destructive basis. It got some >> attention when in 2003 there was a global news release about this work >> relating to updating Newtonian laws, with deliberate inertia violation >> using Lorentz force, it that had no reaction. Had I been taken seriously >> then, we would have been making daily trips to the Moon by now, and >> gearing up for space mining, etc. >> >> Unfortunately for "modern physicists", as I right (from my inertia >> violation experiments) they are all wrong. I don't expect them to like >> being wrong, so resistance from their side is to be expected. I can only >> appeal to their commitment to the scientific method, which has it that all >> knowledge is provisional, and so subject to revision or expulsion. >> >> Look at the gains. Burning all the e=mcc=hv stuff and updating physics >> will create plenty of jobs for physicists and engineers, for all time to >> come! No end of learning and finding, with new machines always going for >> new things. Why stick to the old and rotten, the senseless and the >> constricting? May truth overcome the cunning of the globally established >> liars. With my physics, the universe gets infinite like human potential. >> Courage! >> >> Cheers, >> Arindam Banerjee >> >> The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode >> Arindam Banerjee, >> HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne >> 10 Nov 2023 >> (All rights reserved) >> >> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ >> >> *** >> >> Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0 >> >> Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into near >> space , and horizontal tunneling shown in >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6pjy0Wvujs&t=19s ========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========