Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Re: ? ? ?
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 08:18:04 +0100
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <l67dnaFikkfU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <1HWE6H1jV8YTvxfaaL7fnCCcpe8@jntp> <l3qubtFoko5U1@mid.individual.net> <OUBwWk7nMWGNJZmcRmw2PSfJVnw@jntp> <uraf1j$k54i$1@dont-email.me> <l3tl1lF7v86U1@mid.individual.net> <urcb9o$14049$1@dont-email.me> <H8rfjmuhUKt3d2dH4AwyunFLrCQ@jntp> <l4060uFjpt5U1@mid.individual.net> <L_G9QLYwTstxrFecTVopJTtYH98@jntp> <EwNCN.10443611$ee1.4526609@fx16.ams4> <l42p7pF1fdhU1@mid.individual.net> <uriu05$3kjja$1@paganini.bofh.team> <l45ek0Fe0s6U1@mid.individual.net> <urobnk$3v1g$1@dont-email.me> <l4ak2fF7mb7U1@mid.individual.net> <1bcd63e24f9d1f35a1aa7af1b44091d2@www.novabbs.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net a3VP0lLLOv+TfOtPbCDDvgLbpLllMJrfhUWjEOa0ErXCVIJ6q8
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CnSKqqR9OpfGlAgOMU48ebUdu6Y= sha256:SdL1tWbALEoiWee+v25hJdc+6uBo9YWCKgkY5kcEXyc=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
In-Reply-To: <1bcd63e24f9d1f35a1aa7af1b44091d2@www.novabbs.org>
Bytes: 2868

Am 21.03.2024 um 14:05 schrieb bertitaylor:

>>>> Sure, the increase of entropy over time is a known fact.
>>>> But that does not say very much about time itself, because time is
>>>> required for the increase of entropy in the first place.
>>>
>>> the Entropy 𝗜𝗦 time. Please stop 𝗻𝗼𝘁 undrestanding tensors. Look
>>> at this:
>> No, because both terms are related, but not equal.
>
>> Second law of thermodynamics means actually heat distribution.
>
> They had no clue about the radiant nature of heat when they started
> talking about entropy.

Heat transfer is possible in three different ways:

transport of heated media (convection)
dissipation of heat within some sort of stuff (conduction)
radiation

Therefore it is not true, that thermal energy is always transported by 
radiation.



> Radiation is essentially force.

Well, but no.

Actually you (apparently) mean 'fields' with 'essential'.

To call a field 'force' is totally wrong.

The term 'force' stems from the measurement of a field. But fields exist 
without measurement.

So, if I decode your statement properly, you like to say, that heat 
transfer by radiation utilises the em-field.

That would be actually correct.

> With distance it becomes nearly zero from its source.
> Creating the overall background radiation.

Now you want to explain CMBR?

I personally think, that CMBR has nothing to do with the big-bang, but 
is caused by the gravitational field of the Earth.
....


TH