Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.sf.fandom,rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Which Decade was the best for Doctor Who?
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 04:30:41 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <uv8g7i$1l880$2@dont-email.me>
References: <uuu2cr$1qhp$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <Ubu357$2pcag$1@dont-email.me>
 <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <uv67tu$10nsn$1@dont-email.me> <LWAt+0A$KtFmFwaD@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>
Injection-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:06:26 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="02cf5c5ec541f3f490c792c54891d83a";
	logging-data="1745152"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+5tyy4I/aOxrX4vl5GUaF0MQm3e2+McyM="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Az8zsyOhQdYjwlJL4SAnq94IKNM=
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.12N (x86 32bit)
Bytes: 1605

john_nospam@jhall.co.uk wrote:
> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>> Ubiquitous  <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:

>>>>>1970s?
>>>>>1980s?
>>>>
>>>>I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>>
>>>The JN-T years.
>>
>>I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>
>Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?

Late 1970's to the early 1980's.

--
Let's go Brandon!