Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!snipe.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) Newsgroups: news.software.nntp Subject: Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 12:23:23 +0100 Organization: Sn!peCo World Wide Wading Birds Lines: 28 Message-ID: <1qsd68j.4k48ozngtgbpN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> References: <1qsc0up.13veal619hghjyN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <1qscfld.1ctibjm1vx48dyN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <1qscxj3.1y6kvpn1his7pgN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <7768d8e1381741affcf783eff0e6026d@www.novabbs.org> Reply-To: snipeco.1@gmail.com (Sn!pe) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 13:23:24 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: snipe.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e8130194ebe63c99645e8fe066d73e21"; logging-data="305466"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/zE6eSEegeo7qr77GXMtz7" User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.6b1 (ed136d9b90) (Mac OS 10.13.6) Cancel-Lock: sha1:4NlWtvOiGgRvh/sNLkinTgBzAzo= X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett; WonK; Large Enid X-Disclaimer: Any advice that I may give is worth only what I paid for it. This article comprises only my personal opinions unless otherwise stated. May contain traces of nuts. X-Tongue-In-Cheek: Always X-Validate: All genuine Sn!peCo articles contain the header: "Injection-Info: snipe.eternal-september.org;" my registered FQDN. X-Copyright: Copyright (c) 2024 Sn!peCo WWWB, All Rights Reserved. This article may be reproduced for the purposes of propagation and personal use only, no commercial use without express permission. X-Face: 5 wrote: > Marco Moock wrote: > > > On 21.04.2024 um 09:45 Uhr Sn!pe wrote: > > >> I find it hard to believe that genuine new users of Usenet might > >> sincerely hold such regressive, trollish views. If "cancel culture" > >> takes root in Usenet one might as well be on Twitter. > > > In my age group (Gen Z), such views are widespread. > > I've noticed that. The acceptance that a person would want someone else to > decide for them what they can and can not read seems so foreign to me. > > Is it fear of alternative views? > > What do you feel is the main reason some people want views they disagree > with to be removed from society? I find it remarkable that they apparently do not agree with the sentiment "I wholly disapprove of what you say and will defend to the death your right to say it." ascribed to Voltaire. -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe, PA, FIBS - Professional Crastinator My pet rock Gordon just is.