Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Damon Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 00:10:34 -0400 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 04:10:34 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2974691"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2245 Lines: 25 On 5/2/24 12:04 AM, olcott wrote: > On 5/1/2024 10:50 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 5/1/24 11:16 PM, olcott wrote: >>> *You are simply breaking the rules* >>> (a) It is a verified fact that *D(D) simulated by H* cannot >>> possibly reach past line 03 of D(D) simulated by H whether H >>> aborts its simulation or not. >> >> >> Nope, >> >> Statement proven wrong and you didn't refute it. >> > > D(D) is required to be simulated by H, you merely ignored > those words. > My D was simulated by my H. Since you haven't defined H, except as an infinte set, I can do that. You are just proving your stupidity, and that you are also just a pathological liar.