Path: ...!news.tomockey.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Byte Addressability And Beyond Date: Sun, 5 May 2024 04:35:51 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <9ef6b3ccf22295ffa50de9ec20623d92@www.novabbs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 05 May 2024 06:35:52 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="33a041cd80492abf930d5e0c5f5526b9"; logging-data="1772066"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ArEtqmoxu0VJ9tZTpCeyF" User-Agent: Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8) Cancel-Lock: sha1:xCZcAFHEJceqitLqSnL5JBnBAZw= Bytes: 1616 On Sun, 5 May 2024 01:49:52 +0000, MitchAlsup1 wrote: > Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >> So using the same register name to address a halfword gives you the low >> half of the register, not the high half? > >> Whereas using the same memory address to address a halfword gives you the >> high half of the word at that location, not the low half? > > Concrete example:: That’s a “yes”.