Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Muttley@dastardlyhq.com Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: on Perl Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 08:57:08 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 40 Message-ID: References: <20240408075547.000061e8@gmail.com> <20240415152951.000079ab@gmail.com> <20240416084923.00005c8a@gmail.com> <20240416085912.00001a9b@gmail.com> <20240416091813.00003dd8@gmail.com> <20240417075943.00006cb4@gmail.com> <20240417095512.00007ccc@gmail.com> <20240418101653.00001aa4@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 10:57:08 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7855b986906a0d75353095e951857fe9"; logging-data="3070629"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19c4g6z/RrNu/cAKm1wNy1I" Cancel-Lock: sha1:syIH8yhYr3rsQ7qSUSTcnR3oRHE= Bytes: 3336 On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 10:16:53 -0700 John Ames wrote: >On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 07:33:14 -0000 (UTC) >Muttley@dastardlyhq.com wrote: > >> There are plenty of fields I haven't worked in that I would also >> consider serious eg agriculture, automotive, energy. >> >> Games arn't on that list. > >Very well, then! That leaves us with the larger questions: > >* By what logic do you argue that a language which is commonly used in > fields which are (by your own admission) "pretty big" but (in your > assessment) not "serious" is therefore "pretty irrelevant in most > language discussions?" The amount of code written in the language. I doubt game scripting amounts to much in the scheme of things. >* What about all of the other non-game applications people have cited? > Are none of these "serious" by your standards? Don't remember them tbh. A serious application IMO is something that impacts society as a whole in that if it didn't exist we'd be in trouble or something that benefits a persons ability to live their life. If games vanishes some teenagers and kidults might get a bit annoyed for a while before they went outside and played with a ball but society would carry on as before. >> Are you expecting to be taken seriously? > >Were *you,* when you decided to start throwing around terms like >"aspie?" (2009 called, they want their insult back.) Its a very relevant insult given these days every socially awkward moron decides they're on the spectrum so they can have some kind of disadvantage kudos.