Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: FPP Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Biden Botches Laken Riley's Name During SOTU Shouting Match With MTG Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 10:07:07 -0400 Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn. Lines: 62 Message-ID: References: <17bb5d81a0daa0d3$477$2601257$cad58068@news.newsdemon.com> Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 14:07:08 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="866255e9d7f6f21dcf5228058326e7a5"; logging-data="3153709"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+OxgE70IHr9Q6PFHZ4B6wg" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:pv/WT9QIrxAvjOTjltd0nGcLuwk= In-Reply-To: <17bb5d81a0daa0d3$477$2601257$cad58068@news.newsdemon.com> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 4000 On 3/10/24 5:34 AM, trotsky wrote: > On 3/9/24 3:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >> In article , >>   "Adam H. Kerman" wrote: >> >>> BTR1701 wrote: >>>> suzeeq wrote: >>>>> On 3/9/2024 10:53 AM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> >>>>>> . . . >>> >>>>>> Again, this wouldn't even be an issue if the president would just >>>>>> do his >>>>>> legally mandated duty and SECURE THE BORDER. >>> >>>>> And how's he supposed to do that when the Rs in the House are not >>>>> willing to work with him >>> >>>> In his first month in office, Biden issued 94 executive orders >>>> facilitating mass illegal alien entry into the country and prohibiting >>>> the Border Patrol from preventing any illegal from entering the U.S. >>> >>> I don't necessarily disagree, but Trump abused Title 42. It was >>> indefensible. It had to be ended. >>> >>>> He could start with rescinding every one of those executive orders. He >>>> didn't need any Republican cooperation to issue those EOs in the first >>>> place and he doesn't need any Republican cooperation to rescind them >>>> now. >>> >>>> Second, under existing law, including the Immigration and Nationality >>>> Act of 1952, the president of the United States has the authority to >>>> turn every single foreign national away at the border if he determines >>>> it's necessary to safeguard the country, to include refugees. There is >>>> no requirement in law or in the Constitution that we entertain millions >>>> of fraudulent asylum claims (or even legitimate asylum claims, as rare >>>> as those may be). >>> >>> Asylum creates a right in law for a foreign national to claim. I >>> certainly don't agree with you. Those have to be adjudicated. >> >> There is, nevertheless, an exception in the law that allows the >> president to close the border even to asylees if an emergency exists in >> his discretion. I'd ask if this current unmitigated chaos doesn't >> qualify as an emergency, what would? > > > > Okay, that made me laugh out loud. If it was an emergency, they wouldn't have just taken a week off (from relaxing and doing nothing) to relax and do nothing. Nothing says EMERGENCY!!! like taking ANOTHER tax payer funded vacation. -- "Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC Bible 25B.G. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0 Gracie, age 6. https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0