Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moviePig Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: [OT] Professor inflitrates pro-Palestinian encampment; union leader calls for consequences Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 11:19:01 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 48 Message-ID: References: <20240505204412.000020d9@example.com> Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 17:19:03 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c1730ace7618f99c718c5118c481b7e9"; logging-data="3721425"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+YVhmbwnS69F53yYiqQV6u4610b14yXcY=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:gA7kpNruSTJNjDBq4kmiP2/0hRk= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 3539 On 5/12/2024 10:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > In article , > moviePig wrote: > >> On 5/12/2024 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> On May 12, 2024 at 3:54:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/12/2024 6:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>> In article , >>>>> moviePig wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/10/2024 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> And now the Scarf Lady, Dr. Deborah Birx, says that thousands of >>>>>>> Americans could be injured from the mRNA Wuhan Flu shot and that >>>>>>> some groups should not have been forced to get the jab. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Weird how she wasn't saying that when Biden's decree was "take the >>>>>>> shot or you're fired" in the federal government. Back then, she >>>>>>> and your vaunted 'fact checkers' would only repeat the mantra that >>>>>>> it's 'safe and effective'. >>>>>> >>>>>> You mean it *shouldn't* have been called safe and effective?... >>>>> >>>>> Ask the people who were injured from the jab whether they think the >>>>> government should have told them it was safe. >>>> >>>> I'm asking what a responsible public health official ought to have said. >>> >>> How about the truth? >> >> The truth is that every medical procedure *including NO procedure* >> carries some risk. > > And an ethical medical professional explains the type and extent of that > risk, as well as its frequency of occurrence in the population. > > They don't ignore the risk and just tell you "it's safe and effective". > (And don't forget the denigration and censorship of anyone who suggested > otherwise, who have yet again turned out to be right in the end.) People who know there's always a small risk don't need to be told. And people who *don't* know it will grossly overreact when they *are* told. So, the public at large heard "safe and effective", which, in context, the vaccine very much was. Meanwhile, one needn't support censorship to strongly disapprove of sensationalist life-threatening disinformation.