Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Arthur Lipscomb <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.sf.fandom
Subject: Re: Which Decade was the best for Doctor Who?
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 08:23:01 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <uve80l$32j4m$1@dont-email.me>
References: <uuu2cr$1qhp$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>
 <1354982695.734545394.097383.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
 <uv93fl$1pbbb$2@dont-email.me> <nbv6A4B+GEGmFwWc@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>
 <uv9jq4$22ht$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 17:23:02 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bdf73bfe05c361f71cb6426118afb45c";
	logging-data="3230870"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/eUYmMUlquiiankmHVcqDqiuU4FMQC/VA="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+2wJ0Ne3Ok0FnThbORfGr8aaeBM=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <uv9jq4$22ht$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Bytes: 2033

On 4/11/2024 2:13 PM, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <nbv6A4B+GEGmFwWc@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
> John Hall  <john@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>> In message <uv93fl$1pbbb$2@dont-email.me>, Cryptoengineer
>> <petertrei@gmail.com> writes
>>> The best Dr. Who decade is the decade in which
>>> you first encounter the show.
>>
>> For me that was the 1960s, but I don't consider that the best decade.
>> For me that would have to be the 1970s. And though William Hartnell was
>> my first Doctor, I consider Tom Baker's Doctor the best. Colin Baker's
>> was the worst - through no fault of his own, it was just that the way
>> the series chose to develop his character was misguided IMO.
> 
> Many seem to choose the 1970s.
> 

It's not, "The 70s."  It's Tom Baker!  LOL  :-)