Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 11:45:10 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: BLM and Rittenhouse Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv References: <17c105665460c9c9$74$4075406$4ed50460@news.newsdemon.com> <17c10aee9eb49ab5$37206$3384359$c2d58868@news.newsdemon.com> <17c1554881e6f860$47316$3081049$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com> Content-Language: en-US From: moviePig In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 71 Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 15:45:10 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 3810 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17c195517c0b87ac$48982$3384359$c2d58868@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 4206 On 3/30/2024 10:32 AM, NoBody wrote: > On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 13:33:36 -0700, BTR1701 wrote: > >> In article >> <17c1554881e6f860$47316$3081049$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>, >> moviePig wrote: >> >>> On 3/29/2024 2:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>> In article , FPP >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 3/28/24 6:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>> moviePig wrote: >>>>>>> On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>> On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Because BLM ain't racist like you. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> BLM isn't racist? >>>>>>>>>> HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior race. I >>>>>>> don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief necessary >>>>>>> to the organization's stated aim. >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, at least we agree that all the claims of "white supremacy" that we >>>>>> constantly hear about from progs are bullshit. >>>> >>>>>> Scott followed up to say that the definition of a white nationalist is >>>>>> someone believing "the white race is superior to all other races" >>>> >>>> (1) Mind your attributions, Shit-Shoes. I didn't say what your quote >>>> levels claim I did. >>>> >>>> (2) That's not the definition of a white nationalist. >>>> >>>> A nationalist is someone who believes in the policy or doctrine of >>>> asserting or giving primacy to the interests of one's own nation viewed >>>> as separate from the interests of other nations or the international >>>> community. >>>> >>>> A white nationalist is someone who believes all that and is white. >>>> >>>>> and asked, "Do you believe that white nationalists are racist?" >>>> >>>> The answer would be-- like most groups of people-- some are and most >>>> aren't. >>>> >>>> Just as black nationalists, taken as a whole, would count a few racists >>>> among their group while most are just people advocating that the >>>> interests of their own country should be the priority. >>> >>> What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"? >> >> The same thing we call someone who praises "the browning of America": a >> racist. > > Don't look for any honesty out him. It would be earth shattering if > he were. Do you (honestly) think BTR answered the question (honestly)?