Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: Arkalen <arkalen@proton.me>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: The unravelling of OoL
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 18:11:04 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <uvbmeq$2eojv$1@dont-email.me>
References: <urtugg$1heh2$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="99848"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.14.0
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:BfwkrWVO3KmzZIJ9D/fRsUZUc7w=
In-Reply-To: <urtugg$1heh2$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2709

On 02/03/2024 02:13, MarkE wrote:
> Here is further evidence that OoL research is really only at base camp, 
> if that. Excitement and optimism over reported progress needs to be 
> tempered thus:
> 
> "Explaining isolated steps on the road from simple chemicals to complex 
> living organisms is not enough. Looking at the big picture could help to 
> bridge rifts in this fractured research field."
> https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00544-4
> 

snip

Okay you know what I've now seen three different sources describing this 
article as confirming ID/debunking OoL research and that *look* like 
they read it (as in, they quote from it & claim to have read the full 
thing) so I'd really like to see for myself what it says. Anybody have a 
subscription to Nature & feel generous with PDFs?