Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: FPP Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: BIDEN: "Trump Won't Denounce Political Violence!" Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 12:09:52 -0400 Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn. Lines: 99 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 18:09:53 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ba31c705bf7defc4a112340eb2476fbd"; logging-data="2470800"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+oLk/qkdieOycRv6gIaGR9" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:gf/pcYNs3c7fsWdY3PnEyH2424A= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 5531 On 4/17/24 3:02 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > In article , FPP > wrote: > >> On 4/16/24 3:11 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> In article , FPP >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 4/14/24 2:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>> In article , >>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2024 at 6:15:20 PM PDT, FPP wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 4/9/24 12:46 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2024 at 6:53:43 AM PDT, FPP wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/6/24 2:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> . . . >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> And you still haven't explained why Biden hasn't denounced any of >>>>>>>>>>>>> them, since he's decreed that denouncing political violence is >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> duty of every president. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [Fred Phelps citing headline] >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fact check: Joe Biden has condemned Antifa, violent protests >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Wait, I thought Antifa didn't exist? Now you're claiming it does >>>>>>>>>>> and that Biden has condemned them? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Wow. Baby steps, I guess. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Or do they only exist to the extent you can win on Usenet today? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It exists as a concept, but not as an organization. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> LOL! So it was a concept that was trying to burn down the federal >>>>>>>>> courthouse every night in Portland during the 2020 Summer of Love, >>>>>>>>> was it? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm so confused about Fred Phelps' position here. These large-scale >>>>>>>> protests that included violence, arson, and vandalism were organized >>>>>>>> through Twitter by people forwarding tweets. An "organization" is a >>>>>>>> body that organizes something. A protest was organized by those >>>>>>>> tweeting. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Of course Effa is full of it here. Even his fellow leftists recognize >>>>>>> Antifa as a thing, not just some ephemeral 'concept'. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> He acts like since they don't issue membership cards they're not a >>>>>>> group. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> fact that they worked in concert is what made them an organization, >>>>>>>> even without being organized as a corporation, partnership, or >>>>>>>> unincorporated society with charters and bylaws and other organic >>>>>>>> documents. Working together by passing the word along is what made >>>>>>>> them an organization. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It exists as a means of organizing among those doing the organizing. >>>>>>>> This is actual, not conceptual. Working together toward a common >>>>>>>> purpose is all that's necessary to be an organization. >>>>>> >>>>>> Two dumbfucks don't make a right. >>>>>> >>>>>> From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two ignorant >>>>>> fucks bitching and whining on Usenet. >>>>> >>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when? >>>> >>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and defend. >>> >>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking >>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an oath to >>> defend Congress, jackass. >>> >> Constitution written in 1787. Ratified 1788. Met 1789. > > Which mean there was no Congress until at least 1789, not 1787 as you > claimed above. > > Any questions? > All I mentioned was a date. I made no claim. Reading trouble? Again??? -- "Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC Bible 25B.G. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0 Gracie, age 6. https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0