Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Adam H. Kerman" Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: MSNBC Host/Guest Worry Campus Protests Could Spark "Ferocious" Backlash, New Reagan Era Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 02:21:07 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 44 Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Mon, 06 May 2024 04:21:08 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="545622967c631d88f79fa21cf97c4e8f"; logging-data="2448786"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ryJ/scLVcFN1XLWvkeQla7y3ECrRdXzc=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:cE0Zxz+oF0k0xVRuC1PHl6pNsbQ= X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Bytes: 2941 BTR1701 wrote: >May 5, 2024 at 1:05:47 PM PDT, Adam H. Kerman wrote: >>The Horny Goat wrote: >>>Sun, 5 May 2024 04:13:55 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman : >>>>>That said, most Democrats would consider 2016-2020 to be a rather >>>>>darker time than the Reagan era. >>>>You're kidding, right? The parties realigned in the election of Reagan. >>>>Significant parts of the Democratic coalition went over to the >>>>Republican party to vote for Reagan. Large portions of the labor >>>>movement no longer voted Democratic, like Teamsters. >>>No actually I wasn't - I wasn't talking electorally - I was talking >>>with respect to society generally and where it was going. >>What else would the party its members care about? A large part of the >>electorate became Republican. That was quite a dark time for the >>remaining Democrats. >>>I was thinking about BLM and George Floyd - not "how many Democrats >>>can we get elected" but "this country is now more divided any time >>>since Viet Nam in the LBJ/Nixon era" >>Cynically, certain Democratic politicians thought that not making sure >>that basic law enforcement was being performed versus criminals who took >>advantage of George Floyd protestors to loot and commit vandalism and >>arson thought they were playing to their own base of voters and >>solidifying support. They didn't care about division but what they >>perceived as personal political advantage to them. >>Plenty of other Democrats were horrified at the societal breakdown. >Twenty years ago, who would have thought that by 2024 the following statements >would be politically explosive: >"Violent criminals should be arrested and sent to prison." >and >"Men cannot give birth." Didn't you hear yesterday's advice on screening mammograms for trans men starting at age 40?