Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Adam H. Kerman" Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: 5th Circuit police couldn't have known to check address before raid Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 14:18:49 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 19 Message-ID: Injection-Date: Mon, 06 May 2024 16:18:49 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="545622967c631d88f79fa21cf97c4e8f"; logging-data="2749706"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19X1wQY9wYOwkmJOlLxpzb77m/BlA9xlIw=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:9Vy3rqOINMrd4h7b2JhV3pqEXC0= X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Bytes: 1604 Steve Lehto video In a bad SWAT raid in 2019 at the wrong location, the Fifth Circuit ruled that the SWAT team commander couldn't have known he had the correct house before ordering a raid on the wrong house. Seriously? Some of us learned how to read an address as very young children. Three-judge panel ruled that there was a Fourth Amendment violation but the SWAT commander is still immune. There's even a case called Maryland v. Garrison in which the Supreme Court ruled that police must make a reasonable effort to determine that they are at the right location before exercising the warrant but that case didn't make it absolutely clear that it applied to the facts of this case. Huh? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YK9og5O8S1Q