Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: FPP Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Inconvenient lefties Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 20:15:21 -0400 Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn. Lines: 99 Message-ID: References: <17c2951988fe8093$63098$3121036$c0d58a68@news.newsdemon.com> <17c2cf26c4db72b2$7802$1100308$44d50e60@news.newsdemon.com> Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:15:24 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="dfcafe902cfc4b5681de4315fb4f1626"; logging-data="1020511"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18B99bQHaYY6FHdjFGT40vi" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:Y0ANqveyl8ejonPW2JEQH/0T9oc= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 5764 On 4/4/24 3:32 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > In article , FPP > wrote: > >> On 4/3/24 2:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> On Apr 3, 2024 at 8:36:11 AM PDT, "moviePig" wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/3/2024 5:50 AM, FPP wrote: >>>>> On 4/2/24 5:52 PM, moviePig wrote: >>>>>> On 4/2/2024 1:16 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote: >>>>>>> BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>> Mar 27, 2024 at 3:58:45 PM PDT, moviePig : >>>>>>>>> 3/27/2024 6:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Adam H. Kerman : >>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> Why is it that burning the American flag is protected speech, >>>>>>>>>>>> but if you burn an Alphabet Mafia rainbow flag, you can get >>>>>>>>>>>> arrested for a hate crime? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You mean a flag that does not belong to you, not your own flag. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No, I mean any rainbow flag. If you go buy one yourself, then take >>>>>>>>>> it to an anti-troon protest and burn it, it's a hate crime. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But if you buy an American flag and take it to an Antifa riot and >>>>>>>>>> burn it, protected speech. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The former action is one of hate, the latter is one of protest. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://ibb.co/0FpvG4S >>>>>>> >>>>>>> moviePig is unparseable here. Is he stating that protestors protest >>>>>>> against their friends and not their enemies? I'm so confused. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm here to help. >>>>>> >>>>>> In general, people who burn an American flag do so in protest of their >>>>>> own government's actions and policies, while those who burn a rainbow >>>>>> flag do so to express their hate of queers. >>>>> >>>>> If you own it, you can burn it. >>>> >>>> But not at a gay-pride march under laws against hate speech. >>> >>> There are no laws against hate speech in the United States. If any >>> legislature should pass such a law, it would be unconstitutional. > >> That was in the old Constitution. You know... the one Roberts, Alito, >> IKavanaugh, and Barret swore up and down they would go by. >> And then didn't. >> >> Settled law, my ass. Alito quoted a 17th century Witch Hunter in his >> draft opinion on Roe (Dobbs). > > Did he? That's awesome! > >> Fuck this Illegitimate Supreme Court of Religious Fanatics. > > This Supreme Court has reinforced free speech over government control > and sanction at nearly every opportunity, so regardless of whether > you're mentally fucking them or not (shudder), don't look for them to > suddenly embrace the notion of carving out a heretofore never before > noticed exception to the 1st Amendment and allow the government to start > suddenly punishing people for 'hate speech'. > This Supreme Court is illegitimate. Filled with perjurers and corrupt grifters. And your approval of them embracing a 17th century witch hunter tells us everything we need to know how you feel about rape - because that's what they were justifying, and you were applauding. Rape. > Alito chose to quote from Sir Matthew Hale, a 17th-century English jurist whose writings and reasonings have caused enduring damage to women for hundreds of years. > > The so-called marital rape exemption — the legal notion that a married woman cannot be raped by her husband — traces to Hale. So does a long-used instruction to jurors to be skeptical of reports of rape. Thanny... lover of rape justification. Who would have thunk it? > Alito’s opinion resurrects Hale, a judge who was considered misogynistic even by his era’s notably low standards. Hale once wrote a long letter to his grandchildren, dispensing life advice, in which he veered into a screed against women, describing them as “chargeable unprofitable people” who “know the ready way to consume an estate, and to ruin a family quickly.” Thanny... ever the Ladies Man! >> Settled law, my ass. Alito quoted a 17th century Witch Hunter in his >> draft opinion on Roe (Dobbs). > > Did he? That's awesome! Well said! -- "Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC Bible 25B.G. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0 Gracie, age 6. https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0