Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Moebius <moebius@example.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: how
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 23:44:44 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <v09a4c$1s2q1$1@dont-email.me>
References: <qHqKnNhkFFpow5Tl3Eiz12-8JEI@jntp> <uvulr4$36plc$1@dont-email.me>
 <stohwU8_tXR1lFqmbIJKGgksu_Q@jntp> <v00upr$3pm7b$1@dont-email.me>
 <ZBi4zgLNiT37UPa-AXe7ZNaUYVk@jntp> <v01ggs$3tc37$1@dont-email.me>
 <L2UhMbkkW3TeMvDoHPdBrhXFsds@jntp> <v068oc$137lt$1@dont-email.me>
 <hJLbsBln3PsUHAxhjVb27EqPUbo@jntp> <v090b6$1ph3s$1@dont-email.me>
 <QrfMhZS5r9QSREW0yg-NA62Wt2g@jntp> <v098rk$1rm51$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: moebius@example.invalid
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 23:44:44 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="23d1da5862a78885c18aa0308cdcf91a";
	logging-data="1968961"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+2/QweDNNcjs5Joz95ggMs"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Lv075bH5aMi6scqofJh4i+MHznM=
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <v098rk$1rm51$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2547

Am 23.04.2024 um 23:23 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
> On 4/23/2024 12:13 PM, WM wrote:
>> Le 23/04/2024 à 20:57, FromTheRafters a écrit :
>>> WM was thinking very hard :
>>>> Le 22/04/2024 à 20:02, FromTheRafters a écrit :
>>>>> WM has brought this to us :
>>>>>> Le 21/04/2024 à 00:44, FromTheRafters a écrit :
>>>>>>> WM wrote :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What is a gap in the ordinals?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is a not existing ordinal between two ordinals. It is a not 
>>>>>>>> existing natural number next to ω, for instance.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sets do not have not existing elements.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is ω - 1?
>>>>>
>>>>> An absurdity.
>>>>
>>>> Not more nor less than ω.
>>>
>>> What is the value of ω?
>>
>> It cannot be expressed in units as a finite initial segment of ℕ.
> 
> So, you were always missing your largest natural number from the get go? 
> You are a moron? WM, sure seems to think that there _is_ a largest 
> natural number, he just cannot see it, so, well, it must be dark. lol! 
> Your largest natural number is already in the set of all natural numbers!

Der Mann ist ein geisteskranker Spinner.