Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Cryptoengineer Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.fandom Subject: Re: MT VOID, 05/17/24 -- Vol. 42, No. 46, Whole Number 2328 Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 05:27:23 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 07:27:23 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6bcad81852a862c51c353f3365c61688"; logging-data="488296"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18TaT2gqBRBrcILlAkqYZvapJrvQiX6raE=" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad) Cancel-Lock: sha1:CJefjeia9vDY3e2VLSTJqWdm1Nk= sha1:fa/V/1kDqXndOGHDIuVLc0y1/x0= Bytes: 2229 Paul Dormer wrote: > In article , evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com > (Evelyn C. Leeper) wrote: > >> Incidentally, a follow-up > > And another follow-up, just seen a plot description of a film on TV today > in which a person is descried as a "latter-day Mary Whitehouse". > > For those that don't know, Mary Whitehouse was a teacher in the sixties > and later who campaigned against the permissive society, but she didn't > come to prominence until the mid-sixties, so latter-day is wrong. > > (Incidentally, the BBC did a biopic of her a few years ago, after her > death. In one scene, she decides to start an organisation called Clean > Up National Television. Her husband takes her aside to point out the > unfortunate acronym.) > The sixties were 60 years ago. How long ago does something have to be to be able to say 'latter-day' for a new incarnation? Mary was sincere, and iirc fought cleanly, but she was on the wrong side of history. Most amusingly, her presence led to the launching of a British skin magazine titles 'Whitehouse'. Pt