Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Stan Brown Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: No fault cell phone law Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 10:27:04 -0700 Organization: Oak Road Systems Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net 5FqN+FB7Qt5qmaHLq9n6dA62rVyUYSkuxVoQCXjIiobrbcE16t Cancel-Lock: sha1:7HoQJsTIZ/Vgm+izDAv6s8Ogxqc= sha256:ugccHwCrrHbF7syUk2Bm4mmYI00BpI85E62/l2VTZ5Q= User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.11 (GRC) Bytes: 2379 On 17 Mar 2024 16:27:03 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote: > > Stan Brown wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:41:25 -0700, The Real Bev wrote: > > > On 3/16/24 4:53 PM, pothead wrote: > > > > On 2024-03-16, Thuma wrote: > > > >> Anyone running their mouth on a cell phone and jaywalking should be > > > >> considered fair game to stop and beat the shit out of them, or just run > > > >> them over. > > > >> > > > >> It is not the responsibility of automobile drivers with the right-of-way > > > > There is no such thing as "an automobile driver with > > the right of way." > > > > It's basic driver's ed. You NEVER "have" the right of > > way. Instead, there are various situations where you > > must yield the right of way. You only proceed when none > > of those situations exist. > > > > One of those situations, of course, is a pedestrian in > > your path. No matter how heedless or annoying they may > > be, you have no right to hit them with your vehicle or > > even drive in a way that threatens to do so. > > The Real Bev severely cut the 'Newsgroups: line (without saying so). > The original list apparently was: > > Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns > > I think that says enough. Indeed. Yes, I agree. -- Stan Brown, Tehachapi, California, USA https://BrownMath.com/ Shikata ga nai...