Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Anonymous Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than Android when RCS messaging is involved Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 23:06:15 -0400 Organization: Mixmin Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 03:06:17 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news.mixmin.net; posting-host="c4af4a3027e8317d29ea238d8aa6bb2f616aa3fc"; logging-data="500374"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@mixmin.net" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 4492 Lines: 83 Chris wrote: > Anonymous wrote: >> Chris wrote: >>> Anonymous wrote: >>>> Chris wrote: >>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Java Jive wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2024 01:58, Hank Rogers wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So is trump. They are much alike and have never done anything wrong. Ever. >>>>>>>>>>>> Neither has ever committed a crime or screwed a customer or business partner. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That is provably untrue, in that Trump has already lost two civil cases, >>>>>>>>>>> wherein one of which a jury found him to be a rapist - in most civilised >>>>>>>>>>> people's view, that is both committing a crime and screwing someone. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Losing a civil case is not the same as a criminal conviction. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The claim was the he "never done anything wrong". Losing a civil case is a >>>>>>>>> clear case of doing something wrong. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No it's not. Anyone can sue anyone for anything. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And? If the court finds against you you've legally done something wrong. >>>>>> >>>>>> Not morally. >>>>> >>>>> Are you saying that Trump has never done anything morally wrong? You've >>>>> completely lost any sense of reality. >>>>> >>>>> At the very least he cheated on two of his wives. He sexually assaulted one >>>>> woman (probably more) and he defrauded several banks and the IRS. >>>> >>>> If he legitimately "knife to the throat" raped women, >>> >>> What the fuck does that mean? >>> >>>> then why wasn't >>>> he criminally prosecuted? >>> >>> Like you said yourself the US system doesn't provide justice, especially >>> against rich, powerful men. Sexual assault hasn't been treated well by the >>> CJS for a long time. >> >> Well, you probably think Jacqueline Coakley was telling the truth. LOL! >> >> Forget accusations, most rape _convictions_ are false. > > Spoken like a true misogynist. Go read what happened to Harvey Weinstein. > Are there any aspects of the law you trust? From here it sounds like you'd > prefer the wild west. > >>>>>> There are countless laws that literally invent crimes and proscribe >>>>>> punishments when there is no concrete harm being done to anyone or >>>>>> anything. >>>>> >>>>> Countless, really? Examples. >>> >>> Notable you didn't answer this. >> >> All laws that punish mere possession of firearms by peaceable men, for one, >> if you really want to get into that debate. > > Why do "peaceable men" need to have a gun? In modern society there's no > need for anyone to be carrying guns. It's just boys pretending to be men. Because bad and evil men exist. This isn't changed by modern society. > When everyone is carrying a gun But not everyone carries a gun. > you can't differentiate between the good > and bad guys. When you ban guns the bad guys are easy to spot. > > But "muh freedom" is more important. Idiots the lot of them.