Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Anonymous Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than Android when RCS messaging is involved Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 22:53:46 -0400 Organization: Mixmin Message-ID: References: <757fef4d5b.DaveMeUK@BeagleBoard-xM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 02:53:48 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news.mixmin.net; posting-host="c4af4a3027e8317d29ea238d8aa6bb2f616aa3fc"; logging-data="4040467"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@mixmin.net" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 3479 Lines: 67 Chris wrote: > Anonymous wrote: >> Chris wrote: >>> Anonymous wrote: >>>> David Higton wrote: >>>>> In message >>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Oh and the election wasn't stolen. >>>>> >>>>> The reality, i.e. what was determined from the observable facts, was >>>>> that >>>> >>>> ...they stopped counting in the middle of the night, >>> >>> As per their rules (in a few counties) laid down before the election began. >>> People are allowed to sleep. >> >> Only to resume counting a relatively short time later? >> >> Furthermore, if you are counting mail-in votes (which should be >> banned), you should be required to remain in that room until it's >> DONE. No exceptions. > > Says who? It'll solve nothing. > > There's only one reason why you want to ban mail-in ballots. > >>>> threw out the >>>> observers, >>> >>> Because they were trying to interfere with the count. >> >> No they weren't. >> >>> They were no longer observers. >> >> They were observers. >> >>>> and trucked in enough fraudulent ballots to swing the >>>> election. >>> >>> Didn't happen. >> >> They had overwhelming motive and opportunity. Therefore, it is >> reasonable to shift the burden of proof to those who claim the >> election was clean. > > Already happened. All of Trump's cases claiming the above were either > dismissed or found against him. 0/62 is an impressive failure rate. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_U.S._presidential_election All that proves is that the courts are thoroughly corrupt. A lot of those cases were dismissed on procedural grounds. > You keep crying. > >>> In all cases of voter fraud two things were discovered 1) in no instance >>> was there enough to come close to affect any vote, 2) most of the >>> fraudulent ballots were in favour of GOP candidates. >> >> "Cases of voter fraud" as reported by the fake media, which simply >> does not report cases of fraud in favor of Democrat candidates. > > lol. If you really believe this, living life must be difficult for you. > >