Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Chris Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than Android when RCS messaging is involved Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 12:15:18 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 62 Message-ID: References: <757fef4d5b.DaveMeUK@BeagleBoard-xM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:15:18 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f945b2613a5d8e588bd9d669c841de39"; logging-data="2485252"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+KYdNJMYHHCqj29r9KzzVUJNXV+waTEZg=" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:O6d1Koofx6zd6ua8jSH0M+0lTaQ= sha1:9rc+b0odiqasvMHxI9dypreNsaI= Bytes: 3547 Alan wrote: > On 2024-04-11 19:53, Anonymous wrote: >> Chris wrote: >>> Anonymous wrote: >>>> Chris wrote: >>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>> David Higton wrote: >>>>>>> In message >>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Oh and the election wasn't stolen. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The reality, i.e. what was determined from the observable facts, was >>>>>>> that >>>>>> >>>>>> ...they stopped counting in the middle of the night, >>>>> >>>>> As per their rules (in a few counties) laid down before the election >>>>> began. >>>>> People are allowed to sleep. >>>> >>>> Only to resume counting a relatively short time later? >>>> >>>> Furthermore, if you are counting mail-in votes (which should be >>>> banned), you should be required to remain in that room until it's >>>> DONE. No exceptions. >>> >>> Says who? It'll solve nothing. >>> >>> There's only one reason why you want to ban mail-in ballots. >>> >>>>>> threw out the >>>>>> observers, >>>>> >>>>> Because they were trying to interfere with the count. >>>> >>>> No they weren't. >>>> >>>>> They were no longer observers. >>>> >>>> They were observers. >>>> >>>>>> and trucked in enough fraudulent ballots to swing the >>>>>> election. >>>>> >>>>> Didn't happen. >>>> >>>> They had overwhelming motive and opportunity. Therefore, it is >>>> reasonable to shift the burden of proof to those who claim the >>>> election was clean. >>> >>> Already happened. All of Trump's cases claiming the above were either >>> dismissed or found against him. 0/62 is an impressive failure rate. >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_U.S._presidential_election >> >> All that proves is that the courts are thoroughly corrupt. A lot of those >> cases were dismissed on procedural grounds. > > Then Trump's lawyers should have followed procedure. You'd think a "billionaire" could afford competent lawyers...