Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Chris Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than Android when RCS messaging is involved Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 00:14:41 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 97 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 02:14:42 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bb1a3742418a6b069cd99cb4a52a0229"; logging-data="3445825"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18QVpJE+nt6F7wu+DhKvpApaaT1/52RqXU=" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:6BIguWX2C+hZ5v4jKh6yMqn/GvQ= sha1:iKFOWoqOfdTqhZIxgi9fMtvI9WU= Bytes: 5526 Anonymous wrote: > Chris wrote: >> Anonymous wrote: >>> Chris wrote: >>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java Jive wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2024 01:58, Hank Rogers wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So is trump. They are much alike and have never done anything wrong. Ever. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Neither has ever committed a crime or screwed a customer or business >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partner. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is provably untrue, in that Trump has already lost two civil cases, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wherein one of which a jury found him to be a rapist - in most civilised >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people's view, that is both committing a crime and screwing someone. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Losing a civil case is not the same as a criminal conviction. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The claim was the he "never done anything wrong". Losing a civil case is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> clear case of doing something wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No it's not. Anyone can sue anyone for anything. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And? If the court finds against you you've legally done something wrong. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Not morally. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Are you saying that Trump has never done anything morally wrong? You've >>>>>>>>>> completely lost any sense of reality. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> At the very least he cheated on two of his wives. He sexually assaulted one >>>>>>>>>> woman (probably more) and he defrauded several banks and the IRS. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If he legitimately "knife to the throat" raped women, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What the fuck does that mean? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> then why wasn't >>>>>>>>> he criminally prosecuted? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Like you said yourself the US system doesn't provide justice, especially >>>>>>>> against rich, powerful men. Sexual assault hasn't been treated well by the >>>>>>>> CJS for a long time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, you probably think Jacqueline Coakley was telling the truth. LOL! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Forget accusations, most rape _convictions_ are false. >>>>>> >>>>>> Spoken like a true misogynist. >>>>> >>>>> Go read what happened to Harvey Weinstein. >>>> >>>> He got what he deserved. Maybe you want to join him? >>> >>> No he didn't. Maybe you should be rape hoaxed. >> >> You're getting incoherent. Are the drugs wearing off? >> >>>>>> Are there any aspects of the law you trust? From here it sounds like you'd >>>>>> prefer the wild west. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> There are countless laws that literally invent crimes and proscribe >>>>>>>>>>> punishments when there is no concrete harm being done to anyone or >>>>>>>>>>> anything. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Countless, really? Examples. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Notable you didn't answer this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All laws that punish mere possession of firearms by peaceable men, for one, >>>>>>> if you really want to get into that debate. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why do "peaceable men" need to have a gun? In modern society there's no >>>>>> need for anyone to be carrying guns. It's just boys pretending to be men. >>>>> >>>>> Because bad and evil men exist. This isn't changed by modern society. >>>> >>>> No one needs vigilantes. >>> >>> Self-defense is not vigilantism. >> >> Pre-empirically carrying a gun is not "self-defence". > > Yes it is. Nope. It's a pre-meditated act. You're armed with the intention to harm.