Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jim Pennino Newsgroups: sci.physics,comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: A Problem To Solve :-) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 07:00:33 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 58 Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2024 14:01:04 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1c97c2c9bbcc5401121b94af724d0bb5"; logging-data="2662689"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19DanAplPl7IHMIZzFMRwcN" User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-101-lowlatency (x86_64)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:9yiohAiB/t1itIwY7CLYmTzOpGU= Bytes: 3541 In sci.physics Physfitfreak wrote: > On 3/31/24 20:15, Jim Pennino wrote: >> In sci.physics Physfitfreak wrote: >> >> >> >>> If the missile computes that 5 fighter jets at time t will exactly be at >>> these coordinates in the sky: >>> >>> Jet 1: (4.38 km, 3.9 km, 8.1 km) >>> Jet 2: (5.23 km, 9.61 km, 4.74 km) >>> Jet 3: (6.93 km, 6.01 km, 6.88 km) >>> Jet 4: (8.32 km, 2.12 km, 2.5 km) >>> Jet 5: (2.53 km, 4.23 km, 5.82 km) >>> >>> then answer the following 2 questions: >>> >>> 1- what would be the coordinates of the point in the sky, that the >>> missile with the weakest warhead needs to explode at, at time t, to >>> damage all those 5 fighter jets critically enough? >> >> It depends on the velocity, which in physics has both a direction and >> magnitude, of the jets. >> >>> >>> 2- within what minimum radius of that explosion, any fighter jet would >>> get critically damaged at time t? >>> >> >> And again, it depends on the velocity, which in physics has both a >> direction and magnitude, of the jets. >> >> Jets have long been able to outrun an explosion, even nuclear given >> enough lead, that is behind them. >> >> You also need to know the characteristics of the warhead, which is >> measured in overpressure versus distance from detonation. >> >> > > > Not that you've got any intention to solve the problem (I don't think > you can solve it) and you just want to be a dick as usual, still, I add > for others who may be interested, that the point you're making is the > business of missile's own software, and not this problem. Missile itself > computes the point at which it can get just early enough and explode so > the damaging effects would reach all five targets by the time t and at > those five locations that the targets are, as given above. As someone that has actually spent several years dealing with anti-aircaft missiles all I can say is that you haven't a clue how either the intercept equations or warheads work. This is just your usual Dunning-Kruger babbling nonsense.