Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connectionsPath: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: DFS Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: You Have No Worth: GNU/Linux Problem Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 11:02:14 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 84 Message-ID: References: <17c06bcd4c02275c$40357$3265$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:02:12 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="026030a9c3920d5c68f7df1fee425d10"; logging-data="3062934"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1++buubEb5h+YPrsUi6wzC0" User-Agent: Betterbird (Windows) Cancel-Lock: sha1:beyS16vbDCwtDzn7AZkAcBnHfmY= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3939 On 3/27/2024 9:46 AM, Tyrone wrote: > On Mar 26, 2024 at 4:53:07 PM EDT, "Farley Flud" wrote: > >> This group seems to be infested with blowhards who don't >> know shit. >> >> Well, let's prove it. >> >> I have a question, problem, issue, or what-the-fuck-ever. >> >> On my standalone, desktop workstation I use PDNSD as a >> caching nameserver. (If your distro doesn't have it then >> your distro is FUBAR.) >> >> My PNSD config file contains the addresses of all the >> Internet root DNS servers. There ain't no way in fucking >> hell that I will use my ISP DNS server. >> >> Each time I boot, which, because I use a standalone desktop >> workstation, is daily, I will check the Internic fundamental >> "named.root" file for any changes to the root addresses: >> >> ftp://ftp.internic.net/domain/named.root >> >> Usually, there are none. But lately my check has registered >> changes to the date of file service only. >> >> Why does ICANN report a change to the fundamental "named.root" >> when only the service date has changed? >> >> Huh? Why? You didn't quote: "C'mon you advocate phonies. Answer the fucking question or else get the fuck out and join the Facebook Girl Scout page. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! Fucking deadbeat phonies!" > > You are such a fucking fool. The page where you copied all of this nonsense: > > > > answers the question: > > "The named.root file is effectively a very small ancillary piece of DNS. > As such, it's trivial to update it if / when other parts of the DNS root > change. > > Think about it this way. You tell make to rebuild files (like > named.root) any time other source files (like the root zone) is updated. > It doesn't matter if the contents that go in the target file > (named.root) change or not. The process causes a new target file to be > created. > > So when the root zone file is updated (new TLD, or existing TLD > nameserver changes, or DNSSEC data changes) the associated named.root > file will /also/ be updated. It's a cascading effect, even if the > contents of the named.root file doesn't substantially change." Good bust! Feeb asks about updates to the Root Hints file on alt.os.linux, then 3 years later comes to cola to label everyone a "blowhard phony" that might not know what he also didn't know. He's the blowhard phony, as usual. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Give me C, simple and unchanging C, and I shall bury these Microslop cronies _I_ am the true innovator -------------------------------------------------------------------- > When are you going to grow up? He's early 40's and lives in Mom's basement, so don't expect much.