Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: I rejected "vi" & emacs back in 1982, Provo Utah. Date: 29 Mar 2024 04:31:00 GMT Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: <4ubb0jdl953raihvur6lcvmigmtdgv02oj@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net iVARlKppZPuG8P6WJGNrbg1vlpvsndvrLumEN1D7ZTEFDxdJju Cancel-Lock: sha1:QfhhlvRVI1Qmq1T4WywQtsD9iio= sha256:HS6RX41ygJGuXqV36BfhC1jadtCy1L6uLDDWK3o92xs= User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba) Bytes: 1394 On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:27:20 -0700 (Seattle), Relf wrote: > I rejected "vi" & emacs back in 1982, Provo Utah. > Back then, I called my text editor "j"; > I don't remember who wrote it, maybe WordPerfect. There is a reason Vim is called vi improved. The first release was in 1991. In 1982 I was probably using the WordStar that came bundled with the Osborne 1. In '85 I switched to Brief on MS-DOS. Borland bought Brief and buried it.