Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?= Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: Steps counting apps Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 19:14:04 +0200 Organization: Camembert Normand au Lait Cru Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 19:14:04 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="00b5ee684a5424ba98e6463ca6ba2140"; logging-data="1762310"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18KoFKkJkqjUa4z+Rjzy7R/SUO3JwV94k8=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101 Betterbird/115.10.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:AUpE+K4h5c+94kL0vR6vRNHTOOU= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: de-CH, en-GB Bytes: 1923 On 16.05.24 19:05, Dave Royal wrote: > Jim the Geordie Wrote in message: >> I just set up 4 apps before going out. When I got back: they said I had >> taken 305, or 476, or 210, or 558 steps!!! > > You can't have been out for long! Or they grossly underestimate. > Why not do a test, count your steps, and see which one us best? +1; even the 558 steps are at best 250 m. > I see there's an NHS app: have you got that? And there are - or > were - pedometers - maybe on ebay. The whole issue depends on the sensor quality of the phone and how/where the phone is placed during the count. -- "Alea iacta est." (Julius Caesar)