Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 12:30:13 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 46 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 21:30:14 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c64270d287de33e0b6496e257486af9b"; logging-data="165370"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/xZCHJOPNx4vDkm6RyMU/hWGtnrAm/9WA=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:7TzQMb5z5JtcGrpF7g7zHO2V5jQ= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 3467 On 5/20/2024 12:28 PM, olcott wrote: > On 5/20/2024 2:23 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> On 5/20/2024 12:15 PM, olcott wrote: >>> On 5/20/2024 1:35 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>> On 5/20/2024 10:20 AM, olcott wrote: >>>>> On 5/20/2024 12:15 PM, Bonita Montero wrote: >>>>>> Am 20.05.2024 um 18:01 schrieb olcott: >>>>>>> On 5/20/2024 10:16 AM, Bonita Montero wrote: >>>>>>>> Am 20.05.2024 um 16:47 schrieb olcott: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It is a simple question about the behavior of C functions. >>>>>>>>> This group's purpose is the C/C++ language. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Your question is generic to most languages and you're >>>>>>>> not asking how to do that in C or how to improve that. >>>>>>>> And you're asking the same thing for years. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes I am very persistent. I keep asking until >>>>>>> I get an answer. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> After some time you should recognize you're doing circles. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I am asking a straight forward question that people >>>>> keep ignoring it has nothing to do will my circles: >>>>> Ask until answered stops when answered. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Think of your halt decider running a black box program. >>> >>> *It is not even a halt decider in this post it is merely a simulator* >> [...] >> >> Humm... So, what is your main point? You cannot decide if a program >> will halt, _unless_ you code the test program? >> > > My ONLY point has been to put the people that have continued to > lie about the behavior of D correctly simulated by H in their place. > Several people have consistently lied about this for two years. > My only point is that one cannot 100% totally decide if a black box program will halt, or not.