Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and
 infinite sets --- deciders
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 09:33:47 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <v3cn4b$28tmt$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v3501h$lpnh$1@dont-email.me> <v3a3a3$1nupq$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3a5fc$1o4q1$2@dont-email.me> <v3abb8$1paor$2@dont-email.me>
 <v3ahqd$1qehj$2@dont-email.me> <v3aie6$1qgep$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3ak85$1qoma$1@dont-email.me> <v3amp4$1r7kc$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3bfa3$22lio$2@dont-email.me> <v3bgj4$22o6m$3@dont-email.me>
 <v3c07a$24rgd$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 16:33:47 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="08a73d0f9257967986a8324b25ade22a";
	logging-data="2389725"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18QCnJiSSCKP4CHtmrBDO4A"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:f41iBh2tm5Sk3dHW2sq3C8bnj0I=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v3c07a$24rgd$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3747

On 5/31/2024 3:02 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> Op 31.mei.2024 om 05:36 schreef olcott:
>> On 5/30/2024 10:14 PM, André G. Isaak wrote:
>>> On 2024-05-30 14:15, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 5/30/2024 2:32 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>
>>>>> If you ask to 100% attention, please, pay also attention to the 
>>>>> replies and read more than the first few words. You remove most of 
>>>>> my reply, probably because you did not read them.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I soon as yo show that you are starting with a fundamentally false 
>>>> assumption I stop reading.
>>>
>>> The problem with this approach (and I speak from personal experience) 
>>> is that you frequently stop reading as soon as someone says something 
>>> which you think is “an error” (read: something you disagree with) and 
>>> the ignore the rather detailed explanation the person gives to 
>>> justify the statement which you consider to be “an error”.
>>>
>>> André
>>>
>>
>> I stop reading and focus on the single point of the false assumption
>> pointing out how I know it is false. This allows an honest dialogue
>> to focus on this point until it is resolved.
>>
> 
> And if someone else does the same thing (stop reading the remainder of 
> your posts after several false assumptions), you ask to pay 100% 
> attention to all your words.
> For a honest dialogue, you need to use the same criteria for yourself as 
> you ask from others. If you skip the explanation of others, don't expect 
> others to read your explanation after a false assumption.
> If your want 100% attention for all your words, then also pay 100% 
> attention to the words of others.
> 
> 

Unless it is a typo almost every mistake that anyone points out with
my work is their own false assumption and thus not any mistake with my
work. This is shown now that I insist that people show all of the
details of why they believe I made a mistake.

I proved that Mike Terry was wrong and he simply ignored this proof.
Message-ID: <_BmdneCBVewsOMX7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>

http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3C_BmdneCBVewsOMX7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d%40brightview.co.uk%3E 

On 5/30/2024 11:13 AM, Mike Terry wrote:
 > On 30/05/2024 16:21, olcott wrote:


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer