Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Chris Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than Android when RCS messaging is involved Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 11:15:42 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 111 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 13:15:42 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e07b3d3d8aabe7ea10ba7b86679dc509"; logging-data="302299"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19eON/FGSHBUuWMi/g241TLASxHJvfQGNE=" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:BpfLpdswdOOwtwcfSnDP3CZZkUo= sha1:SLUYNeF7Q03lMerIGNvGSsLvRbY= Bytes: 6275 Anonymous wrote: > Chris wrote: >> Anonymous wrote: >>> Chris wrote: >>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java Jive wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2024 01:58, Hank Rogers wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So is trump. They are much alike and have never done anything wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ever. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Neither has ever committed a crime or screwed a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> customer or business >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partner. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is provably untrue, in that Trump has already lost two civil cases, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wherein one of which a jury found him to be a rapist - in most civilised >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people's view, that is both committing a crime and screwing someone. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Losing a civil case is not the same as a criminal conviction. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The claim was the he "never done anything wrong". Losing a civil case is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clear case of doing something wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No it's not. Anyone can sue anyone for anything. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And? If the court finds against you you've legally done something wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Not morally. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Are you saying that Trump has never done anything morally wrong? You've >>>>>>>>>>>> completely lost any sense of reality. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> At the very least he cheated on two of his wives. He sexually assaulted one >>>>>>>>>>>> woman (probably more) and he defrauded several banks and the IRS. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If he legitimately "knife to the throat" raped women, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What the fuck does that mean? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> then why wasn't >>>>>>>>>>> he criminally prosecuted? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Like you said yourself the US system doesn't provide justice, especially >>>>>>>>>> against rich, powerful men. Sexual assault hasn't been treated well by the >>>>>>>>>> CJS for a long time. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Well, you probably think Jacqueline Coakley was telling the truth. LOL! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Forget accusations, most rape _convictions_ are false. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Spoken like a true misogynist. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Go read what happened to Harvey Weinstein. >>>>>> >>>>>> He got what he deserved. Maybe you want to join him? >>>>> >>>>> No he didn't. Maybe you should be rape hoaxed. >>>> >>>> You're getting incoherent. Are the drugs wearing off? >>>> >>>>>>>> Are there any aspects of the law you trust? From here it sounds like you'd >>>>>>>> prefer the wild west. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There are countless laws that literally invent crimes and proscribe >>>>>>>>>>>>> punishments when there is no concrete harm being done to anyone or >>>>>>>>>>>>> anything. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Countless, really? Examples. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Notable you didn't answer this. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> All laws that punish mere possession of firearms by peaceable men, for one, >>>>>>>>> if you really want to get into that debate. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why do "peaceable men" need to have a gun? In modern society there's no >>>>>>>> need for anyone to be carrying guns. It's just boys pretending to be men. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Because bad and evil men exist. This isn't changed by modern society. >>>>>> >>>>>> No one needs vigilantes. >>>>> >>>>> Self-defense is not vigilantism. >>>> >>>> Pre-empirically carrying a gun is not "self-defence". >>> >>> Yes it is. >> >> Nope. It's a pre-meditated act. You're armed with the intention to harm. >> > > Those in the United States who lawfully carry a concealed handgun > hope they never need to use it, but want to be prepared for that > eventuality. Why? I've been to the US. It isn't as lawless you make out. As a visitor I'm more worried about getting caught in cross-fire than actually being a victim of crime.