Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Anonymous <anon@anon.net>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than Android
 when RCS messaging is involved
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 23:28:42 -0400
Organization: Mixmin
Message-ID: <uv7lda$3kigb$4@news.mixmin.net>
References: <uud0lh$13jd4$1@paganini.bofh.team> <uukmmf$6op7$1@dont-email.me>
 <uuks3l$7ss7$1@dont-email.me> <uuktv2$88f6$1@dont-email.me>
 <uul0n2$ciq7$1@dont-email.me> <uulbg4$22k53$1@news.mixmin.net>
 <uuttdi$2o2ua$1@dont-email.me> <757fef4d5b.DaveMeUK@BeagleBoard-xM>
 <uv504p$3d51p$3@news.mixmin.net> <uv5jpb$rpb9$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 03:28:44 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.mixmin.net; posting-host="c4af4a3027e8317d29ea238d8aa6bb2f616aa3fc";
	logging-data="3820043"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@mixmin.net"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <uv5jpb$rpb9$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2645
Lines: 47

Chris wrote:
> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>> David Higton wrote:
>>> In message <uuttdi$2o2ua$1@dont-email.me>
>>> Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Oh and the election wasn't stolen.
>>>
>>> The reality, i.e. what was determined from the observable facts, was
>>> that
>>
>> ...they stopped counting in the middle of the night,
>
> As per their rules (in a few counties) laid down before the election began.
> People are allowed to sleep.

Only to resume counting a relatively short time later?

Furthermore, if you are counting mail-in votes (which should be
banned), you should be required to remain in that room until it's
DONE. No exceptions.

>> threw out the
>> observers,
>
> Because they were trying to interfere with the count.

No they weren't.

> They were no longer observers.

They were observers.

>> and trucked in enough fraudulent ballots to swing the
>> election.
>
> Didn't happen.

They had overwhelming motive and opportunity. Therefore, it is
reasonable to shift the burden of proof to those who claim the
election was clean.

> In all cases of voter fraud two things were discovered 1) in no instance
> was there enough to come close to affect any vote, 2) most of the
> fraudulent ballots were in favour of GOP candidates.

"Cases of voter fraud" as reported by the fake media, which simply
does not report cases of fraud in favor of Democrat candidates.