Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko Newsgroups: sci.logic Subject: Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V3 Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 11:40:43 +0300 Organization: - Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 10:40:43 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="49eedfb9a8473a9164697c525c11a511"; logging-data="1018235"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18GGwCXYk9GN5iN6A3lK31s" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:5wYFhSyxbZb3K34hvsHMIA5bdp4= Bytes: 2305 On 2024-04-27 17:51:17 +0000, olcott said: > When you agree that H(D,D) is a correct termination analyzer within > my definition then we can proceed to the next point about whether > my definition is correct or diverges from the standard definition. Nobody will agree that H(D,D) is a correct termination analyzer until you post a definition of "termination analyzer" and compare H(D,D) to that definition. And nut even then if the comparison is insufficient or erronous. -- Mikko