Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Joel Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: The Golly! of Python Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 08:26:20 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 38 Message-ID: References: <6622de54$0$2993$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <9gu92jl3pogpv8ac5hdhahlepe3vh4i1tv@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 14:26:21 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5052914d6194640ef81d709f3444d8df"; logging-data="1009074"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+6iTHj9npZI/kWEd8OG4AqeTjhu7bWpB4=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:NtSZV0bB/qCI9zGlBfsulT+I9sM= OS: Linux Mint 21.3 Cinnamon, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI Bytes: 2673 chrisv wrote: >Joel wrote: > >>>> Imagine having to wait so long for your compiler to "warn" you that >>>> you added two numbers, when you should have subtracted them! :-D >>>> >>>> Imagine even considering posting such ridiculous lying idiocy as the >>>> below. Utterly shameless. >>> >>> What >> >> He has obsessions. > >Tell me, when I rub his face into his lies, does that dumb fsck post >his "support" for his snittish attack? I'm hoping so... I know DFS can be a prick, it's just that sometimes it's easier to accept Usenet as being Usenet, than counterattack. But I'm certainly not one to talk, as such, because of past times when I was more emotionally triggered by stuff. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.