Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Anonymous Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than Android when RCS messaging is involved Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 00:32:54 -0400 Organization: Mixmin Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 04:32:55 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news.mixmin.net; posting-host="c4af4a3027e8317d29ea238d8aa6bb2f616aa3fc"; logging-data="1792870"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@mixmin.net" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 5649 Lines: 101 Chris wrote: > Anonymous wrote: >> Chris wrote: >>> Anonymous wrote: >>>> Chris wrote: >>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java Jive wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2024 01:58, Hank Rogers wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So is trump. They are much alike and have never done anything wrong. Ever. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Neither has ever committed a crime or screwed a customer or business >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partner. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is provably untrue, in that Trump has already lost two civil cases, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wherein one of which a jury found him to be a rapist - in most civilised >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people's view, that is both committing a crime and screwing someone. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Losing a civil case is not the same as a criminal conviction. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The claim was the he "never done anything wrong". Losing a civil case is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clear case of doing something wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No it's not. Anyone can sue anyone for anything. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> And? If the court finds against you you've legally done something wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Not morally. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Are you saying that Trump has never done anything morally wrong? You've >>>>>>>>>>> completely lost any sense of reality. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> At the very least he cheated on two of his wives. He sexually assaulted one >>>>>>>>>>> woman (probably more) and he defrauded several banks and the IRS. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If he legitimately "knife to the throat" raped women, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What the fuck does that mean? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> then why wasn't >>>>>>>>>> he criminally prosecuted? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Like you said yourself the US system doesn't provide justice, especially >>>>>>>>> against rich, powerful men. Sexual assault hasn't been treated well by the >>>>>>>>> CJS for a long time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Well, you probably think Jacqueline Coakley was telling the truth. LOL! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Forget accusations, most rape _convictions_ are false. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Spoken like a true misogynist. >>>>>> >>>>>> Go read what happened to Harvey Weinstein. >>>>> >>>>> He got what he deserved. Maybe you want to join him? >>>> >>>> No he didn't. Maybe you should be rape hoaxed. >>> >>> You're getting incoherent. Are the drugs wearing off? >>> >>>>>>> Are there any aspects of the law you trust? From here it sounds like you'd >>>>>>> prefer the wild west. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> There are countless laws that literally invent crimes and proscribe >>>>>>>>>>>> punishments when there is no concrete harm being done to anyone or >>>>>>>>>>>> anything. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Countless, really? Examples. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Notable you didn't answer this. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All laws that punish mere possession of firearms by peaceable men, for one, >>>>>>>> if you really want to get into that debate. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why do "peaceable men" need to have a gun? In modern society there's no >>>>>>> need for anyone to be carrying guns. It's just boys pretending to be men. >>>>>> >>>>>> Because bad and evil men exist. This isn't changed by modern society. >>>>> >>>>> No one needs vigilantes. >>>> >>>> Self-defense is not vigilantism. >>> >>> Pre-empirically carrying a gun is not "self-defence". >> >> Yes it is. > > Nope. It's a pre-meditated act. You're armed with the intention to harm. > Those in the United States who lawfully carry a concealed handgun hope they never need to use it, but want to be prepared for that eventuality.